From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: fix filesystem_sync vs write race on rw=>ro remount
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:53:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100124195309.GX19799@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sk9vd92c.fsf@openvz.org>
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 02:41:15PM +0300, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> Currently on rw=>ro remount we have following race
> | mount /mnt -oremount,ro | write-task |
> |-------------------------+------------|
> | | open(RDWR) |
> | shrink_dcache_sb(sb); | |
> | sync_filesystem(sb); | |
> | | write() |
> | | close() |
> | fs_may_remount_ro(sb) | |
> | sb->s_flags = new_flags | |
> Later writeback or sync() will result in error due to MS_RDONLY flag
> In case of ext4 this result in jbd2_start failure on writeback
> ext4_da_writepages: jbd2_start: 1024 pages, ino 1431; err -30
> In fact all others are affected by this error but it is not visible
> because the skip s_flags check on writeback. For example ext3 check
> (s_flags & MS_RDONLY) only if page has no buffers during journal start.
>
> In order to prevent the race we have to block new writers before
> fs_may_remount_ro() and sync_filesystem(). Let's introduce new
> sb->s_flags MS_RO_REMOUNT flag for this purpose. But suddenly we have
> no available space in MS_XXX bits, let's share this bit with MS_REMOUNT.
> This is possible because MS_REMOUNT used only for passing arguments
> from flags to sys_mount() and never used in sb->s_flags.
It's not a solution. You get an _attempted_ remount ro making writes
fail, even if it's going to be unsuccessful. No go...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-24 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-24 11:41 [PATCH] fs: fix filesystem_sync vs write race on rw=>ro remount Dmitry Monakhov
2010-01-24 11:50 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-01-24 19:53 ` Al Viro [this message]
2010-01-24 21:15 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-01-24 21:37 ` Al Viro
2010-01-24 22:40 ` Dave Chinner
2010-02-09 15:28 ` Jan Kara
2010-01-24 23:01 ` Dmitry Monakhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100124195309.GX19799@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox