From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/01] regulator: support max8649
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:00:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100126120058.GN15759@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <771cded01001260354y7c7db25bqa8bbfe000e0c0380@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 06:54:48AM -0500, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Mark Brown
> > I'd expect the time taken to enable to be the voltage multipled by the
> > step size rather than divided by the step size?
> I don't agree at this point. The unit of step is uV/uSec. The function
> should return uSec. So voltage divided by the step is more reasonable.
Ah, then the variable step is confusingly named since it's actually a
rate of change rather than a step size - I'd suggest rate or something
like that instead.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-26 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <771cded01001120041ue24edabk8e4638ef7151c947@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <771cded01001120051l44fd76bx80d2fd4b6f60bd0b@mail.gmail.com>
2010-01-12 11:51 ` [PATCH 01/01] regulator: support max8649 Mark Brown
2010-01-25 11:01 ` Haojian Zhuang
2010-01-25 13:56 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-26 6:26 ` Haojian Zhuang
2010-01-26 11:01 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-01-26 11:51 ` Haojian Zhuang
2010-01-26 11:04 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-26 11:54 ` Haojian Zhuang
2010-01-26 12:00 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2010-01-26 12:14 ` Haojian Zhuang
2010-01-26 12:41 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-26 16:10 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-03-08 6:28 ` Haojian Zhuang
2010-03-08 8:18 ` Liam Girdwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100126120058.GN15759@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox