From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Americo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Tavis Ormandy <taviso@google.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Julien Tinnes <jln@google.com>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Patch] fix the lockdep warning in tty_fasync()
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:47:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100127014709.GA1189@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100127100742.6AD8.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:09:04AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Commit 703625118 causes a lockdep warning:
> >
> > [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
> > 2.6.33-rc5 #77
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > emacs/1609 just changed the state of lock:
> > (&(&tty->ctrl_lock)->rlock){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff8127c648>]
> > tty_fasync+0xe8/0x190
> > but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
> > (&(&sighand->siglock)->rlock){-.....}
> >
> > This is due to we use write_lock_irq() in __f_setown() which turns
> > the IRQ on in write_unlock_irq(), causes this warning.
> >
> > Switch it to write_lock_irqsave() and write_unlock_irqrestore(),
> > as suggested by Eric.
> >
> > Reported-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
> > Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> >
> > ---
> > diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c
> > index 97e01dc..82cc8a7 100644
> > --- a/fs/fcntl.c
> > +++ b/fs/fcntl.c
> > @@ -199,7 +199,8 @@ static int setfl(int fd, struct file * filp, unsigned long arg)
> > static void f_modown(struct file *filp, struct pid *pid, enum pid_type type,
> > int force)
> > {
> > - write_lock_irq(&filp->f_owner.lock);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + write_lock_irqsave(&filp->f_owner.lock, flags);
> > if (force || !filp->f_owner.pid) {
> > put_pid(filp->f_owner.pid);
> > filp->f_owner.pid = get_pid(pid);
> > @@ -211,7 +212,7 @@ static void f_modown(struct file *filp, struct pid *pid, enum pid_type type,
> > filp->f_owner.euid = cred->euid;
> > }
> > }
> > - write_unlock_irq(&filp->f_owner.lock);
> > + write_unlock_irqrestore(&filp->f_owner.lock, flags);
> > }
> >
> > int __f_setown(struct file *filp, struct pid *pid, enum pid_type type,
>
> I've confirmed the warning disappear :)
Great, I did the same fix, it's now commit id
b04da8bfdfbbd79544cab2fadfdc12e87eb01600 in Linus's tree.
thanks for testing,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-27 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-26 3:20 [2.6.33-rc5] starting emacs makes lockdep warning KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-26 5:25 ` Américo Wang
2010-01-26 5:37 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-26 5:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-26 6:01 ` Américo Wang
2010-01-26 6:07 ` Al Viro
2010-01-26 6:24 ` Américo Wang
2010-01-26 6:54 ` Al Viro
2010-01-26 7:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-26 8:45 ` Américo Wang
2010-01-26 9:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-26 9:32 ` Américo Wang
2010-01-26 12:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-26 15:58 ` [Patch] fix the lockdep warning in tty_fasync() Américo Wang
2010-01-27 1:09 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-27 1:47 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-01-26 6:17 ` [2.6.33-rc5] starting emacs makes lockdep warning Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-26 18:16 ` check_usage_backwards() && forwards? (Was: [2.6.33-rc5] starting emacs makes lockdep warning) Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-26 18:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-27 2:58 ` Américo Wang
2010-01-27 13:15 ` [tip:core/urgent] lockdep: Fix check_usage_backwards() error message tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100127014709.GA1189@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=jln@google.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=taviso@google.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox