From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu] v2 accelerate grace period if last non-dynticked CPU
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:32:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100128153249.GA7087@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Currently, rcu_needs_cpu() simply checks whether the current CPU has
an outstanding RCU callback, which means that the last CPU to go into
dyntick-idle mode might wait a few ticks for the relevant grace periods
to complete. However, if all the other CPUs are in dyntick-idle mode,
and if this CPU is in a quiescent state (which it is for RCU-bh and
RCU-sched any time that we are considering going into dyntick-idle mode),
then the grace period is instantly complete.
This patch therefore repeatedly invokes the RCU grace-period machinery
in order to force any needed grace periods to complete quickly. It does
so a limited number of times in order to prevent starvation by an RCU
callback function that might pass itself to call_rcu().
However, if any CPU other than the current one is not in dyntick-idle
mode, fall back to simply checking (with fix to bug noted by Lai
Jiangshan). Also, take advantage of last grace-period forcing, the
opportunity to do so noted by Steve Rostedt.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/cpumask.h | 14 +++++++++
init/Kconfig | 16 +++++++++++
kernel/rcutree.c | 5 +--
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index d77b547..dbcee76 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask,
#define for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) \
for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
+#define for_each_cpu_not(cpu, mask) \
+ for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
#define for_each_cpu_and(cpu, mask, and) \
for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask, (void)and)
#else
@@ -203,6 +205,18 @@ int cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int cpu);
(cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
/**
+ * for_each_cpu_not - iterate over every cpu in a complemented mask
+ * @cpu: the (optionally unsigned) integer iterator
+ * @mask: the cpumask pointer
+ *
+ * After the loop, cpu is >= nr_cpu_ids.
+ */
+#define for_each_cpu_not(cpu, mask) \
+ for ((cpu) = -1; \
+ (cpu) = cpumask_next_zero((cpu), (mask)), \
+ (cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
+
+/**
* for_each_cpu_and - iterate over every cpu in both masks
* @cpu: the (optionally unsigned) integer iterator
* @mask: the first cpumask pointer
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index d95ca7c..42bf914 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -396,6 +396,22 @@ config RCU_FANOUT_EXACT
Say N if unsure.
+config RCU_FAST_NO_HZ
+ bool "Accelerate last non-dyntick-idle CPU's grace periods"
+ depends on TREE_RCU && NO_HZ && SMP
+ default n
+ help
+ This option causes RCU to attempt to accelerate grace periods
+ in order to allow the final CPU to enter dynticks-idle state
+ more quickly. On the other hand, this option increases the
+ overhead of the dynticks-idle checking, particularly on systems
+ with large numbers of CPUs.
+
+ Say Y if energy efficiency is critically important, particularly
+ if you have relatively few CPUs.
+
+ Say N if you are unsure.
+
config TREE_RCU_TRACE
def_bool RCU_TRACE && ( TREE_RCU || TREE_PREEMPT_RCU )
select DEBUG_FS
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 099a255..29d88c0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1550,10 +1550,9 @@ static int rcu_pending(int cpu)
/*
* Check to see if any future RCU-related work will need to be done
* by the current CPU, even if none need be done immediately, returning
- * 1 if so. This function is part of the RCU implementation; it is -not-
- * an exported member of the RCU API.
+ * 1 if so.
*/
-int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu)
+static int rcu_needs_cpu_quick_check(int cpu)
{
/* RCU callbacks either ready or pending? */
return per_cpu(rcu_sched_data, cpu).nxtlist ||
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index e77cdf3..c1d97ec 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -906,3 +906,72 @@ static void __init __rcu_init_preempt(void)
}
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU) || !defined(CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ)
+
+/*
+ * Check to see if any future RCU-related work will need to be done
+ * by the current CPU, even if none need be done immediately, returning
+ * 1 if so. This function is part of the RCU implementation; it is -not-
+ * an exported member of the RCU API.
+ *
+ * Because we have preemptible RCU, just check whether this CPU needs
+ * any flavor of RCU. Do not chew up lots of CPU cycles with preemption
+ * disabled in a most-likely vain attempt to cause RCU not to need this CPU.
+ */
+int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+ return rcu_needs_cpu_quick_check(cpu);
+}
+
+#else
+
+#define RCU_NEEDS_CPU_FLUSHES 5
+
+/*
+ * Check to see if any future RCU-related work will need to be done
+ * by the current CPU, even if none need be done immediately, returning
+ * 1 if so. This function is part of the RCU implementation; it is -not-
+ * an exported member of the RCU API.
+ *
+ * Because we are not supporting preemptible RCU, attempt to accelerate
+ * any current grace periods so that RCU no longer needs this CPU, but
+ * only if all other CPUs are already in dynticks-idle mode. This will
+ * allow the CPU cores to be powered down immediately, as opposed to after
+ * waiting many milliseconds for grace periods to elapse.
+ */
+int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+ int c = 1;
+ int i;
+ int thatcpu;
+
+ /* Don't bother unless we are the last non-dyntick-idle CPU. */
+ for_each_cpu_not(thatcpu, nohz_cpu_mask)
+ if (thatcpu != cpu)
+ return rcu_needs_cpu_quick_check(cpu);
+
+ /* Try to push remaining RCU-sched and RCU-bh callbacks through. */
+ for (i = 0; i < RCU_NEEDS_CPU_FLUSHES && c; i++) {
+ c = 0;
+ if (per_cpu(rcu_sched_data, cpu).nxtlist) {
+ rcu_sched_qs(cpu);
+ force_quiescent_state(&rcu_sched_state, 0);
+ __rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_sched_state,
+ &per_cpu(rcu_sched_data, cpu));
+ c = !!per_cpu(rcu_sched_data, cpu).nxtlist;
+ }
+ if (per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu).nxtlist) {
+ rcu_bh_qs(cpu);
+ force_quiescent_state(&rcu_bh_state, 0);
+ __rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_bh_state,
+ &per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu));
+ c = !!per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu).nxtlist;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* If RCU callbacks are still pending, RCU still needs this CPU. */
+ return c;
+}
+
+#endif
next reply other threads:[~2010-01-29 3:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-28 15:32 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-01-31 19:23 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu] v2 accelerate grace period if last non-dynticked CPU Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-01 4:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-02-04 0:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100128153249.GA7087@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox