From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: "Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@hp.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
whalajam@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Added in stricter no merge semantics for block I/O
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:02:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100129080244.GF13771@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1264518884.3278.15.camel@cail>
On Tue, Jan 26 2010, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
> Added in stricter no merge semantics for block I/O
>
> Updated 'nomerges' tunable to accept a value of '2' - indicating that _no_
> merges at all are to be attempted (not even the simple one-hit cache).
>
> The following table illustrates the additional benefit - 5 minute runs of
> a random I/O load were applied to a dozen devices on a 16-way x86_64 system.
>
> nomerges Throughput %System Improvement (tput / %sys)
> -------- ------------ ----------- -------------------------
> 0 12.45 MB/sec 0.669365609
> 1 12.50 MB/sec 0.641519199 0.40% / 2.71%
> 2 12.52 MB/sec 0.639849750 0.56% / 2.96%
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan D. Brunelle <alan.brunelle@hp.com>
> Cc: jens.axboe@oracle.com
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block | 14 ++++++++++++++
> Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt | 10 +++++-----
> block/blk-sysfs.c | 11 +++++++----
> block/elevator.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 3 +++
> 5 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Thanks Alan, I think this is a good addition, I have often before hacked
up the "no merges at all" logic for testing purposes as well. I have
queued it up for 2.6.34.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-29 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-26 15:14 Added in stricter no merge semantics for block I/O Alan D. Brunelle
2010-01-29 8:02 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100129080244.GF13771@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=Alan.Brunelle@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=whalajam@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox