From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Fr??d??ric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
systemtap <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>,
DLE <dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tracing/kprobes] kprobes: Disable booster when CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:27:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100129172757.GA4281@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1264785338.24455.14.camel@laptop>
* Peter Zijlstra (peterz@infradead.org) wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:08 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >
> > If a task is set as stopped, and the preempted before calling schedule,
> > can this result in a preempted task staying in that state for an
> > arbitrary long period of time ? Or is there some mechanism prohibiting
> > that in the scheduler ?
>
> PREEMPT_ACTIVE does that:
>
> preempt_schedule()
> add_preempt_count(PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
> schedule();
>
>
> schedule()
> if (prev->state && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)) {
> if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(prev->state, prev)))
> prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
> else
> deactivate_task(rq, prev, 1);
> switch_count = &prev->nvcsw;
> }
OK, it looks safe for preemption. Is there any unforeseen weird way a
task can be scheduled out and stopped that would permit it to either:
- stall the algorithm forever (DoS)
- appear as quiescent to the algorithm while its stack would hold return
pointers to incorrect locations
?
I'm concerned about page faults here.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-29 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-22 1:16 [RFC PATCH 00/10] Ftrace functions hashlist Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-22 1:16 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] ftrace: Generalize the function hashlist from function profiler Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-22 1:16 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] ftrace: Ensure tracing has really stopped before leaving unregister_ftrace_graph Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-22 1:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-01-22 2:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-22 1:16 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] ftrace: Drop the ftrace_profile_enabled checks in tracing hot path Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-22 2:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-01-22 2:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-01-22 3:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-01-22 4:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-01-22 4:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-01-22 12:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-01-22 14:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-01-25 20:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-25 22:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-01-26 0:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-26 1:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-01-26 1:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-01-27 21:55 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes] kprobes: Disable booster when CONFIG_PREEMPT=y Masami Hiramatsu
2010-01-28 1:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-01-28 4:21 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2010-01-29 9:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-01-29 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-29 14:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-01-29 17:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-01-29 17:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-29 17:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2010-01-29 17:32 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-01-22 2:43 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] ftrace: Drop the ftrace_profile_enabled checks in tracing hot path Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-22 3:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-01-25 20:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-22 1:16 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] ftrace: Ensure buffers are visibles to tracing callbacks right away Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-22 1:16 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] ftrace: Drop buffer check in function profiler callbacks Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-25 6:17 ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-01-30 20:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-22 1:16 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] ftrace: Release the function hlist if we don't need it anymore Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-25 6:41 ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-01-30 21:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-22 1:16 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] ftrace: Make the function hashlist concurrently usable Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-22 1:16 ` [PATCH 08/10] tracing: Simplify test for function_graph tracing Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-22 1:16 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] tracing: Use the hashlist for graph function Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-25 8:50 ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-01-30 21:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-22 1:16 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] ftrace: Factorize search and insertion in the function hashlist Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100129172757.GA4281@Krystal \
--to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).