linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
	ralf@linux-mips.org, kyle@mcmartin.ca, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] improve sys_personality for compat architectures
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 17:31:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100202163145.GA30659@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201002021536.51928.arnd@arndb.de>

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:36:51PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > -       return (long)old;
> > +       return (long)(old == PER_LINUX32 ? PER_LINUX : old);
> >  }
> 
> What does this do for a native 64 bit process setting PER_LINUX32?
> It looks to me like it could never set it back to the original
> value, or am I missing something here?
> 
> It's what the arch specific code does already, but it seems a bit
> strange anyway.

Indeed, this prevents a process from going back to 64bit.  And while
the setarch tool in util-linux also allows going back to 64-bit the
typical use case seems to be going into 32-bit mode.

But if the consensus is that we should fix this properly I can
replace the patch with one introducing a compat_sys_personality
which only gets used for compat tasks.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-02 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-01 18:56 [PATCH 4/6] improve sys_personality for compat architectures Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-02 14:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-02-02 16:31   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-02-03 17:06     ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-02-03 17:13       ` David Miller
2010-02-03 20:04         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-04  7:38           ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-02-04 16:00             ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-05 19:49               ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-09 12:58                 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100202163145.GA30659@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).