* lockdep warning during elevator_switch
@ 2010-01-31 23:55 Hugh Dickins
2010-02-02 20:58 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hugh Dickins @ 2010-01-31 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman, Jens Axboe; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-kernel
>From 2.6.33-rc3 onwards, PROVE_LOCKING=y gives me the warning below when
I "echo deadline >/sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler" to change it from cfq.
Backing out 846f99749ab68bbc7f75c74fec305de675b1a1bf "sysfs: Add lockdep
annotations for the sysfs active reference" stops the warning -
but I realize that doesn't mean the actual problem (if any) is fixed.
(An orthogonal irritation which I don't recall anyone mentioning before:
lockdep's stacktrace involves a console_verbose() to make sure it goes to
console, which is never cancelled: so from that point on my console is
spammed with wireless authentication debug messages every twenty minutes.
But perhaps that's a feature, without which I'd have ignored the lockdep
report for longer; and /proc/sys/kernel/printk can restore the loglevel.)
Hugh
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.33-rc6 #1
---------------------------------------------
sh/889 is trying to acquire lock:
(s_active){++++.+}, at: [<7820a975>] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x27/0x4e
but task is already holding lock:
(s_active){++++.+}, at: [<7820ab82>] sysfs_get_active_two+0x18/0x3e
other info that might help us debug this:
4 locks held by sh/889:
#0: (&buffer->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<7820984e>] sysfs_write_file+0x20/0x99
#1: (s_active){++++.+}, at: [<7820ab82>] sysfs_get_active_two+0x18/0x3e
#2: (s_active){++++.+}, at: [<7820ab91>] sysfs_get_active_two+0x27/0x3e
#3: (&q->sysfs_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<78289e95>] queue_attr_store+0x2e/0x68
stack backtrace:
Pid: 889, comm: sh Not tainted 2.6.33-rc6 #1
Call Trace:
[<784a6966>] ? printk+0xf/0x11
[<781752a1>] print_deadlock_bug+0x99/0xa3
[<781753c6>] check_deadlock+0x11b/0x140
[<781763e5>] validate_chain+0x4ec/0x4f9
[<78176a68>] __lock_acquire+0x676/0x6cf
[<78176b64>] lock_acquire+0xa3/0xbc
[<7820a975>] ? sysfs_addrm_finish+0x27/0x4e
[<7820a37a>] sysfs_deactivate+0x6c/0xa4
[<7820a975>] ? sysfs_addrm_finish+0x27/0x4e
[<7820a975>] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x27/0x4e
[<7820aa3a>] sysfs_remove_dir+0x62/0x72
[<7829d6dd>] kobject_del+0x11/0x32
[<78283406>] __elv_unregister_queue+0x18/0x20
[<78283c66>] elevator_switch+0x6d/0x11b
[<78283d92>] elv_iosched_store+0x7e/0x9b
[<78289eb8>] queue_attr_store+0x51/0x68
[<78209894>] sysfs_write_file+0x66/0x99
[<781cd460>] vfs_write+0x8a/0x108
[<781cd578>] sys_write+0x3c/0x63
[<78125b90>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: lockdep warning during elevator_switch
2010-01-31 23:55 lockdep warning during elevator_switch Hugh Dickins
@ 2010-02-02 20:58 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2010-02-02 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hugh Dickins; +Cc: Eric W. Biederman, Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-kernel
On Sun, Jan 31 2010, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> From 2.6.33-rc3 onwards, PROVE_LOCKING=y gives me the warning below when
> I "echo deadline >/sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler" to change it from cfq.
>
> Backing out 846f99749ab68bbc7f75c74fec305de675b1a1bf "sysfs: Add lockdep
> annotations for the sysfs active reference" stops the warning -
> but I realize that doesn't mean the actual problem (if any) is fixed.
Thanks Hugh, I hadn't noticed this yet. I do online switches all the
time, but depending on tests lockdep may not be enabled (it steals all
my performance...). I'll take a look.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-02 20:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-31 23:55 lockdep warning during elevator_switch Hugh Dickins
2010-02-02 20:58 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox