linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] core: workqueue: BUG_ON on workqueue recursion
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:43:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100203194350.GA13824@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100203122755.0fd4fb7e@marrow.netinsight.se>

On 02/03, Simon Kagstrom wrote:
>
> When the workqueue is flushed from workqueue context (recursively), the
> system enters a strange state where things at random (dependent on the
> global workqueue) start misbehaving. For example, for us the console and
> logins locks up while the web server continues running.
>
> Since the system becomes unstable, change this to a BUG_ON instead.

I agree with this patch. We are going to deadlock anyway, if the
condition is true the caller is cwq->current_work, this means
flush_cpu_workqueue() will insert the barrier and hang.

However,

> @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static int flush_cpu_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
>  	int active = 0;
>  	struct wq_barrier barr;
>
> -	WARN_ON(cwq->thread == current);
> +	BUG_ON(cwq->thread == current);

Another option is change the code to do

	if (WARN_ON(cwq->thread == current))
		return;

This gives the kernel chance to survive after the warning.

What do you think?

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-03 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-03 11:27 [PATCH] core: workqueue: BUG_ON on workqueue recursion Simon Kagstrom
2010-02-03 19:43 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-02-04  2:12   ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-04  8:02     ` [PATCH v2] core: workqueue: return " Simon Kagstrom
2010-02-04 10:52       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-02-12  8:47       ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-04  2:00 ` [PATCH] core: workqueue: BUG_ON " Lai Jiangshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100203194350.GA13824@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).