From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756879Ab0BCW1F (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:27:05 -0500 Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:32984 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756606Ab0BCW07 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:26:59 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=R/YrQRNMPMPOyfv5T5D4Eypl4M2QFlivTP6WYqG5rZ5wDZ8NPqscnN3VGXbBJtmqyk 4rPt6w/Q6+7+Qf7AokrRHUIWtfGoFlOsUQAlpWy+XDzGs1ZQS6Ra5MG09ze4RxI7XtxO 7jUzvw6dWeeasyUXqGaRRZS9onMma6UT02cA0= Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 23:26:21 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Tejun Heo , Rusty Russell , Christoph Lameter , Ingo Molnar , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xiao Guangrong , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree Message-ID: <20100203222616.GF5068@nowhere> References: <20100203163822.2742bcc5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100203163822.2742bcc5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 04:38:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in > include/linux/ftrace_event.h, include/trace/ftrace.h, > kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c, kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c and > kernel/trace/trace_event_profile.c between commit > 430ad5a600a83956749307b13257c464c3826b55 ("perf: Factorize trace events > raw sample buffer operations") from the tip tree and commit > eeb721be6bc03fe37755e69ab5c3ba2fe9897fd9 ("percpu: add __percpu sparse > annotations to trace") from the percpu tree. > > I attempted to fix them up (see below) but someone should check the > result carefully. (The apparently unchanged files below used the tip > tree versions.) > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au I'm not very used to review patches on patches :) But yeah that looks good to me. Thanks!