linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.sf.net
Subject: Re: hung bootup with "drm/radeon/kms: move radeon KMS on/off switch out of staging."
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:12:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100204181218.GA6175@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100204175928.GA20595@srcf.ucam.org>


* Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:54:45PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > But you could claim that it's not a regression because 1) technically the 
> > code got introduced in drivers/staging/, and staging drivers are not on 
> > the regression list 2) the Kconfig value is default-off so it can only 
> > harm those who got lured by a new Kconfig value popping up in -rc7 in a 
> > well working driver they already have enabled.
> > 
> > So the moving of driver functionality from drivers/staging/ to drivers/ 
> > is a grey area it appears. Wouldnt it have been better to do this in the 
> > next merge window, as all other drivers do? It's not new hardware 
> > enablement either, it's feature enablement for an existing driver.
> 
> The reason the option was in staging (as has been mentioned before) was 
> because the ABI wasn't felt to be stable enough. Upstream is now willing to 
> commit to that stability, so now seems as good a time to move it as any. 
> There's no code change and there's no default configuration change, so I 
> really can't see any way that it can be classed as a regression.

But that argument in essence renders the regression policy meaningless for 
such code: just about any new driver feature under the sun could be shaped as 
a Kconfig option, introduced via a drivers/staging Kconfig entry, and then 
activated via a twoliner commit in a later -rc.

IMHO the point of tracking regressions is to reduce the bugginess of the 
kernel and thus to help users, not to give ground for legalistic arguments.

There _are_ common-sense exceptions from the regression rules, such as the 
introduction of a new piece of hardware that was previously unsupported 
(hence there's no expectation of stability) - but the tweaking of an 
existing, widely used driver (even if the new opion is default-off) hardly 
seems to qualify for that.

I dont mind making useful exceptions from rules, as long as we are honest 
about having done it.

Anyway, i've bisected it back to that Kconfig change and i am able to work 
the crashes around by reverting that, so my immediate problems are solved.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-04 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-01  2:20 [git pull] drm fixes Dave Airlie
2010-02-01  2:53 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-02  8:17   ` [crash, PATCH] Revert "drm/radeon/kms: move radeon KMS on/off switch out of staging." Ingo Molnar
2010-02-02  8:25     ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-02 15:44       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 20:39         ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04 20:46           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 21:14             ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-05  0:43               ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-05  7:32                 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-02  8:35     ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-02  8:37       ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-02 15:42         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-02 15:46       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-02 20:34         ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04  6:26           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04  6:39             ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04  7:36               ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04  7:49                 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04  7:17             ` hung bootup with " Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 16:48               ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 17:08                 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 17:15                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-04 17:36                     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 17:36                   ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 17:54                     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 17:59                       ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 18:12                         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-02-04 18:15                           ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 18:56                             ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 19:00                               ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 19:19                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 19:28                                   ` Jerome Glisse
2010-02-04 20:34                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 18:30                           ` Alex Deucher
2010-02-04 19:06                             ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 19:18                               ` Alex Deucher
2010-02-04 19:24                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-04 19:34                                   ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04 20:27                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 19:32                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 19:53                                   ` Jesse Barnes
2010-02-04 20:22                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 20:27                                       ` david
2010-02-04 20:33                                       ` Jesse Barnes
2010-02-04 20:57                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 20:48                                       ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 21:05                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 21:09                                           ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-05  7:56                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-05  8:34                                               ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-05  9:00                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-05  9:18                                                   ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-05 10:47                                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 21:23                                           ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-04 21:34                                             ` Jesse Barnes
2010-02-04 21:35                                             ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-06 11:10                                             ` Felipe Contreras
2010-02-02  8:58     ` [crash, PATCH] Revert " Domenico Andreoli
2010-02-02 11:59       ` Jerome Glisse
2010-02-02 15:11         ` Domenico Andreoli
2010-02-02 11:56     ` Jerome Glisse
2010-02-02 15:42       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-02 23:15         ` Jerome Glisse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100204181218.GA6175@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.sf.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).