From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933665Ab0BEH34 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:29:56 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:49800 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933555Ab0BEH3y (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:29:54 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:29:31 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Tejun Heo Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linus , Andrew Morton , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Rusty Russell , Christoph Lameter , "H. Peter Anvin" , Fr??d??ric Weisbecker Subject: Re: upcoming percpu changes Message-ID: <20100205072931.GD9320@elte.hu> References: <20100205161648.086375b9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4B6BB13C.2090108@kernel.org> <20100205070903.GA9320@elte.hu> <4B6BC948.5030401@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B6BC948.5030401@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Ingo. > > On 02/05/2010 04:09 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Has the review feedback from Frederic and hpa been addressed? (and have they > > acked the solution?) That was the only controversial bit i remember. > > Al Viro said that, until sparse is improved, the only solution would be to > work around in the rather ugly way as posted in the original patches. As > Frederic and hpa preferred not having the workaround and there were only > three instances in the kernel tree, I just left them alone so sparse > warning will trigger spuriously on those three locations. > > Thanks. Ok, good! Ingo