From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] perf_core: provide a kernel-internal interface to get to performance counters
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 12:46:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100206114634.GE5062@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100205222430.1d17a72c@infradead.org>
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:24:30PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:47:48 -0500
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:25:56PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > >From 5db5cd76f3c16c9f6093f54d1ccfb97d04b9a1ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> > > >2001
> > > From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> > > Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:20:57 +0200
> > > Subject: [PATCH] perf_core: provide a kernel-internal interface to
> > > get to performance counters
> >
> > So this patch got accepted into mainline a while ago, without a user
> > ever beeing presented, nevermind actually included in mainline. Time
> > to revert providing these useless exports and dead code?
> >
>
>
> Frederic had a user near mainline.
>
> I have one but it's .35 material at this point...
>
> if you want to insist to bounce the patch out now and back in
> for .35... I don't care but Frederic might.
We can't.
It has a user merged upstream: the hw-breakpoint subsystem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-06 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-25 10:25 [RFC PATCH] perf_core: provide a kernel-internal interface to get to performance counters Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-25 10:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-25 11:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-26 16:03 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-09-26 16:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 16:20 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-09-26 18:32 ` K.Prasad
2009-09-26 18:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-01 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-01 8:16 ` K.Prasad
2009-10-01 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-01 10:01 ` K.Prasad
2009-10-01 10:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-04 22:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-05 9:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-05 10:13 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-10-05 7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-05 8:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-05 9:24 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-10-05 9:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-05 10:08 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-11-21 13:36 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/core: Provide " tip-bot for Arjan van de Ven
2010-02-05 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH] perf_core: provide " Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-05 17:59 ` john smith
2010-02-06 6:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-02-06 11:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-02-06 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-06 16:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-07 17:01 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-25 5:10 john smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100206114634.GE5062@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox