public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/2] sysfs: fix s_active lockdep warning
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 17:22:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100207092216.GA2585@darkstar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265384517.30057.50.camel@laptop>

On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 04:41:57PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 10:30 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > > Right, so this device stuff is much more complicated than I was led to
> > > believe ;-)
> > 
> > Haven't I told you all along that tree-structured locking is
> > complicated?  :-)
> 
> Well, regular tree's aren't all that complicated, but multiple
> inter-locking trees is a whole different story indeed.
> 

I ever tried converting device semaphore to mutex, but failed with same issue.

At least now there's no lockdep solution for it, so I recommend revert
the mutex converting patch.

following lockdep warning with rc6-mm1:

[    0.397123] 
[    0.397124] =============================================
[    0.397359] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[    0.397480] 2.6.33-rc6-mm1 #1
[    0.397596] ---------------------------------------------
[    0.397717] swapper/1 is trying to acquire lock:
[    0.397836]  (&dev->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<c12662e4>] __driver_attach+0x38/0x63
[    0.398162] 
[    0.398162] but task is already holding lock:
[    0.398393]  (&dev->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<c12662d8>] __driver_attach+0x2c/0x63
[    0.399999] 
[    0.399999] other info that might help us debug this:
[    0.399999] 1 lock held by swapper/1:
[    0.399999]  #0:  (&dev->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<c12662d8>] __driver_attach+0x2c/0x63
[    0.399999] 
[    0.399999] stack backtrace:
[    0.399999] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.33-rc6-mm1 #1
[    0.399999] Call Trace:
[    0.399999]  [<c13d5851>] ? printk+0xf/0x11
[    0.399999]  [<c105460c>] __lock_acquire+0x880/0xc0d
[    0.399999]  [<c13d66e4>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xf0/0xff
[    0.399999]  [<c1054a34>] lock_acquire+0x9b/0xb8
[    0.399999]  [<c12662e4>] ? __driver_attach+0x38/0x63
[    0.399999]  [<c13d685c>] __mutex_lock_common+0x35/0x2f2
[    0.399999]  [<c12662e4>] ? __driver_attach+0x38/0x63
[    0.399999]  [<c13d6bb7>] mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x38
[    0.399999]  [<c12662e4>] ? __driver_attach+0x38/0x63
[    0.399999]  [<c12662e4>] __driver_attach+0x38/0x63
[    0.399999]  [<c1265a43>] bus_for_each_dev+0x3d/0x67
[    0.399999]  [<c1265f8f>] driver_attach+0x14/0x16
[    0.399999]  [<c12662ac>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x63
[    0.399999]  [<c126541c>] bus_add_driver+0xc4/0x20c
[    0.399999]  [<c1266553>] driver_register+0x8b/0xeb
[    0.399999]  [<c11d8e3a>] acpi_bus_register_driver+0x3a/0x3c
[    0.399999]  [<c165dc9a>] acpi_ec_init+0x2b/0x4a
[    0.399999]  [<c165daf8>] acpi_init+0x289/0x2c8
[    0.399999]  [<c165d86f>] ? acpi_init+0x0/0x2c8
[    0.399999]  [<c1001139>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x13f
[    0.399999]  [<c163d315>] kernel_init+0x123/0x174
[    0.399999]  [<c163d1f2>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x174
[    0.399999]  [<c10035ba>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-07  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-29  7:01 [Patch 0/2] sysfs: fix s_active lockdep warning Amerigo Wang
2010-01-29  7:02 ` [Patch 1/2] sysfs: add support for lockdep subclasses to s_active Amerigo Wang
2010-01-29  7:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] sysfs: fix the incomplete part of subclass support for s_active Amerigo Wang
2010-01-29  7:21 ` [Patch 0/2] sysfs: fix s_active lockdep warning Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-29  8:38   ` Cong Wang
2010-01-29 13:44     ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-29 14:22       ` Greg KH
2010-01-29 17:57         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-29 18:10           ` Greg KH
2010-01-29 18:14             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-29 18:21               ` Greg KH
2010-01-29 20:10                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-29 20:30                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-04 11:38                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-04 16:35                       ` Alan Stern
2010-02-04 16:41                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-04 18:37                           ` Alan Stern
2010-02-05 10:18                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-05 15:30                               ` Alan Stern
2010-02-05 15:41                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-07  9:22                                   ` Dave Young [this message]
2010-02-08  3:08                                     ` Cong Wang
2010-02-08  3:14                                       ` Dave Young
2010-02-08  3:30                                         ` Cong Wang
2010-02-08  3:06                                 ` Cong Wang
2010-02-08 15:38                               ` Alan Stern
2010-02-04 16:46                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-04 18:40                           ` Alan Stern
2010-02-05  3:09                             ` Cong Wang
2010-02-05  4:06                               ` Alan Stern
2010-02-04 16:46                         ` Greg KH
2010-02-04 16:59                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-02-26 19:36                             ` Alan Stern
2010-02-26 20:54                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-02-05  3:43                       ` Cong Wang
2010-02-05  8:55                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-29 20:25         ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-30  5:30           ` Greg KH
2010-01-29 18:02   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100207092216.GA2585@darkstar \
    --to=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox