From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756291Ab0BGMl2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2010 07:41:28 -0500 Received: from 8bytes.org ([88.198.83.132]:42466 "EHLO 8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754486Ab0BGMl1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2010 07:41:27 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 13:41:26 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Avi Kivity Cc: Joerg Roedel , Marcelo Tosatti , David Woodhouse , kvm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] kvm: Change kvm_iommu_map_pages to map large pages Message-ID: <20100207124126.GA23725@8bytes.org> References: <1264678682-30655-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <1264678682-30655-7-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <20100128222455.GA26274@amt.cnet> <20100129093233.GU17809@8bytes.org> <20100201141804.GD16236@amd.com> <20100201193017.GA27065@amt.cnet> <20100205110145.GZ16236@amd.com> <4B6EB08B.9090705@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B6EB08B.9090705@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 02:22:35PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 02/05/2010 01:01 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: >> >>> Yes, addresses the concern. >>> >> Are there any further objections against this patchset? If not it would >> be cool if you could give me some acks for the kvm specific parts of >> this patchset. >> > > There are two ways we can get the kvm bits in: > > - you publish a git tree excluding the kvm patches, I merge your tree, > then apply the kvm specific patches. This is best for avoiding > merge-time conflicts if I get other patches for the same area. > - you push everything including the kvm bits. > > I'm fine with both, though prefer the former. If you choose the latter, > ACK for the kvm patches. Hmm, the patch set is self-contained and hard to split. We had the same problem with the initial iommu-api merge. Since I have further updates for the AMD IOMMU driver I think its best to send the these patches and my updates directly to Linus after the KVM updates are merged in the next merge window. Thanks for your ACKs :-) Joerg