Re: [patch 8/9] Documentation: Fix invalid rcu assumptions

David Howells
2009-12-11T14:01:35Z

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> -197 * we use RCU protection here
> +196 * caller must be holding the RCU readlocke

You mean "readlock" I suspect.

Otherwise, feel free to add:

Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>