From: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 8/9] PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up (rev. 7)
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 08:41:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100209164116.GA7289@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201002091348.20245.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 01:48:20PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Gary Hade wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:37:08PM -0800, Gary Hade wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:30:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Monday 08 February 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Monday 08 February 2010, Gary Hade wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 09:11:56PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > On Saturday 06 February 2010, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Sunday 10 January 2010 07:01:03 am Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in
> > > > > > > > > principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time,
> > > > > > > > > platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up
> > > > > > > > > events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this
> > > > > > > > > purpose, a PME generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE
> > > > > > > > > associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we
> > > > > > > > > can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured
> > > > > > > > > correctly.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think acpiphp needs a little attention after this patch. Gary
> > > > > > > > Hade noticed while testing Jesse's linux-next branch that acpiphp
> > > > > > > > complains like this:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > acpiphp: ACPI Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.5
> > > > > > > > acpiphp: Slot [9] registered
> > > > > > > > acpiphp: Slot [10] registered
> > > > > > > > acpiphp_glue: failed to register interrupt notify handler
> > > > > > > > acpiphp: Slot [6] registered
> > > > > > > > acpiphp_glue: failed to register interrupt notify handler
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I reproduced this on an HP rx3600 (ia64), and found that acpiphp
> > > > > > > > doesn't complain on commit 82533a617f453, but it *does* complain
> > > > > > > > on commit fb3383bb4ac6e, which seems to be this patch.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I can't see the possible reason looking at the code alone.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Could you add a debug printk() printing the error code returned by
> > > > > > > pci_acpi_add_hp_notifier() in acpiphp_glue.c:register_slot(), please?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rafael, On the system where I ran into the problem it returns
> > > > > > AE_NOT_FOUND. See below.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, that means there's no struct acpi_device object associated with handle.
> > > > >
> > > > > I must admit I didn't take that into consideration, but it should be easily
> > > > > fixable. I'll send a patch for that later today.
> > > >
> > > > Patch appended.
> > > >
> > > > If the theory is correct, it should fix the issue. Please test.
> > >
> > > Well, acpiphp now loads OK with no disturbing messages:
> > > [ 247.360878] pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5
> > > [ 247.385048] acpiphp: ACPI Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.5
> > > [ 247.385459] acpiphp_glue: found PCI host-bus bridge with hot-pluggable slots
> > > [ 247.385486] acpiphp_glue: found ACPI PCI Hotplug slot 1 at PCI 0000:02:01
> > > [ 247.385519] acpiphp: Slot [1] registered
> > > [ 247.386167] acpiphp_glue: found PCI host-bus bridge with hot-pluggable slots
> > > [ 247.386196] acpiphp_glue: found ACPI PCI Hotplug slot 2 at PCI 0000:06:01
> > > [ 247.386225] acpiphp: Slot [2] registered
> > > [ 247.386828] acpiphp_glue: found PCI-to-PCI bridge at PCI 0000:0a:00.0
> > > [ 247.386861] acpiphp_glue: found ACPI PCI Hotplug slot 3 at PCI 0000:0b:00
> > > [ 247.386902] acpiphp: Slot [3] registered
> > > [ 247.387564] acpiphp_glue: found PCI-to-PCI bridge at PCI 0000:0f:00.0
> > > [ 247.387597] acpiphp_glue: found ACPI PCI Hotplug slot 4 at PCI 0000:10:00
> > > [ 247.387620] acpiphp: Slot [4] registered
> > > [ 247.388293] acpiphp_glue: found PCI-to-PCI bridge at PCI 0000:14:00.0
> > > [ 247.388324] acpiphp_glue: found ACPI PCI Hotplug slot 5 at PCI 0000:15:00
> > > [ 247.388347] acpiphp: Slot [5] registered
> > > [ 247.389041] acpiphp_glue: found PCI-to-PCI bridge at PCI 0000:19:00.0
> > > [ 247.389077] acpiphp_glue: found ACPI PCI Hotplug slot 6 at PCI 0000:1a:00
> > > [ 247.389114] acpiphp: Slot [6] registered
> > > [ 247.389736] acpiphp_glue: Bus 0000:1a has 1 slot
> > > [ 247.389739] acpiphp_glue: Bus 0000:15 has 1 slot
> > > [ 247.389742] acpiphp_glue: Bus 0000:10 has 1 slot
> > > [ 247.389746] acpiphp_glue: Bus 0000:0b has 1 slot
> > > [ 247.389748] acpiphp_glue: Bus 0000:06 has 1 slot
> > > [ 247.389751] acpiphp_glue: Bus 0000:02 has 1 slot
> > > [ 247.389753] acpiphp_glue: Total 6 slots
> > >
> > > However, I didn't have a chance to confirm that hot-add of a
> > > PCI card works correctly before someone else swiped the system
> > > from me for a while. I will verify this when I get it back,
> > > hopefully later today.
> >
> > I got the system back but unfortunately have some bad news.
> > The system has 2 hotpluggable PCI-X slots and 4 hotpluggable
> > PCIe slots. I tried hot-adding both a PCI-X card and a PCIe
> > card but acpiphp did not seem to see the hot-add event for
> > either card. acpiphp was loaded with debug=1 and issued no
> > messages when I added the cards.
>
> I gather it works without the $subject patch?
I don't know for sure. Late Friday after running into the handler
registration issue I reverted 8/9 which required hand fixup for
one hunk failure. I then got some compile errors which I assumed
may be related to my non-removal of some of the other patches in the
series. I started reverting the entire series but got a failure right
away with 9/9 but didn't take the time to try to resolve it.
Since it sounds like you are doubtful that your changes are
responsible for this new issue I will try to make time to fuss
with this more today.
Gary
--
Gary Hade
System x Enablement
IBM Linux Technology Center
503-578-4503 IBM T/L: 775-4503
garyhade@us.ibm.com
http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-09 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-10 13:31 [PATCH 0/9] PCI run-time PM support (rev. 3) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-10 13:35 ` [PATCH 1/9] PCI PM: Add function for checking PME status of devices Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-15 17:55 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-10 13:36 ` [PATCH 2/9] PCI PM: PCIe PME root port service driver (rev. 5) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-10 13:37 ` [PATCH 3/9] PCI PM: Make it possible to force using INTx for PCIe PME signaling Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-10 13:38 ` [PATCH 4/9] ACPI: Add infrastructure for refcounting GPE consumers Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-10 13:39 ` [PATCH 5/9] ACPI: Add support for new refcounted GPE API to drivers Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-10 13:40 ` [PATCH 6/9] ACPI: Remove old GPE API and transition code entirely to new one Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-10 13:48 ` [PATCH 7/9] ACPI / PM: Add more run-time wake-up fields (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 8/9] PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up (rev. 7) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-05 23:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-02-06 0:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-06 20:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-08 17:53 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-08 19:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-08 21:12 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-08 21:30 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-08 23:37 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-09 0:53 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-09 12:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-09 13:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-09 16:41 ` Gary Hade [this message]
2010-02-09 17:35 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-09 20:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-09 20:58 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-09 23:31 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-10 1:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-10 1:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-10 17:48 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-10 18:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-10 20:38 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-10 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-10 22:13 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-10 22:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-10 23:04 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-10 23:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-11 0:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-11 2:07 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-11 13:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-11 18:29 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-11 18:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-02-11 20:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-11 20:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-11 21:56 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-11 22:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-12 1:55 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-12 11:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-13 0:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-13 1:27 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-14 13:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-15 19:22 ` Gary Hade
2010-02-15 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-10 14:02 ` [PATCH 9/9] PCI PM: Run-time callbacks for PCI bus type (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100209164116.GA7289@us.ibm.com \
--to=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox