public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
To: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: don't read past config->interface[] if usb_control_msg() fails in usb_reset_configuration()
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:52:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100209225250.GA5182@xanatos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B71DB34.5090708@gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 11:01:24PM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> After the loop `for (i = 0; i < config->desc.bNumInterfaces; i++)' if no
> break occurred, i equals config->desc.bNumInterfaces. so if
> usb_control_msg() failed then after goto reset_old_alts we read from
> config->interface[config->desc.bNumInterfaces].
> 
> Reported-by: "Juha Leppanen" <juha_motorsportcom@luukku.com>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> >> You correctly identified a problem, but your fix is wrong -- or at 
> >> least, it is much too complicated. The proper fix goes like this:
> > 
> >  	/* If not, reinstate the old alternate settings */
> >  	if (retval < 0) {
> >  reset_old_alts:
> > -		for (; i >= 0; i--) {
> > +		for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> >  			struct usb_interface *intf = config->interface[i];
> >  			struct usb_host_interface *alt;
> 
> 
> Are you really sure this is better?

Yes.

> If usb_hcd_alloc_bandwidth() fails, in the loop _before_ the
> reset_old_alts label, don't we still have to reinstate the old
> alternate settings for that usb_interface config->interface[i]? This
> was what my initial patch tried to do.

No, you do not.  Take a look at usb_hcd_alloc_bandwidth() in
drivers/usb/core/hcd.c.  If an allocation fails for interface i when
the HCD's check_bandwidth() function is called, then
hcd->driver->reset_bandwidth is called.  We only need to clean up the
interfaces that have successfully been allocated bandwidth (0 to i - 1).

> Alternatively usb_hcd_alloc_bandwidth() could undo what it does if an
> error occurs there, then I think i could be decremented.

Yes, that's what usb_hcd_alloc_bandwidth() does at the reset label.

Sarah

      reply	other threads:[~2010-02-09 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-09 13:00 [PATCH] USB: don't read past config->interface[] if usb_control_msg() fails in usb_reset_configuration() Roel Kluin
2010-02-09 13:08 ` Greg KH
2010-02-09 13:15   ` roel kluin
2010-02-09 15:12 ` Alan Stern
2010-02-09 16:01   ` Roel Kluin
2010-02-09 22:01     ` Sarah Sharp
2010-02-09 22:09       ` roel kluin
2010-02-17 23:40         ` Greg KH
2010-02-18  1:36           ` Roel Kluin
2010-02-09 22:01     ` Roel Kluin
2010-02-09 22:52       ` Sarah Sharp [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100209225250.GA5182@xanatos \
    --to=sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roel.kluin@gmail.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox