From: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arun Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [v11 PATCH 1/9]: cpuidle: Design documentation patch
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:43:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100210021303.GA5079@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B7194C6.8010306@xenotime.net>
* Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> [2010-02-09 09:00:54]:
> On 02/09/10 00:29, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
> > * Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2010-02-09 13:58:16]:
> >
> > This patch adds a little information about the redesigned cpuidle
> > infrastructure in Documentation/cpuidle/core.txt
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/cpuidle/core.txt | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> >
> > Index: linux.trees.git/Documentation/cpuidle/core.txt
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.trees.git.orig/Documentation/cpuidle/core.txt
> > +++ linux.trees.git/Documentation/cpuidle/core.txt
> > @@ -21,3 +21,38 @@ which can be used to switch governors at
> > is meant for developer testing only. In normal usage, kernel picks the
> > best governor based on governor ratings.
> > SEE ALSO: sysfs.txt in this directory.
> > +
> > +Design:
> > +
> > +Cpuidle allows for registration of multiple sets of idle routines.
> > +The latest registered set is used by cpuidle governors as the current
> > +active set to choose the right idle state. This set is managed as a
> > +list and each time the newly registered set is added to the head of the
> > +list and made the current active set.
> > +
> > +An example of how this would work on x86 is shown below.
> > +
> +----------------- -----------------
> +| | | |
> +| choose b/w | mwait is chosen | mwait |
> +| mwait, poll, |-------------------------------------> |(current active|
> +| default, c1e | register to cpuidle | set) |
> +| | with mwait as the idle routine | |
> +----------------- -----------------
>
> What is "b/w" above? "between"? I've see "btw" used a few times as an
> abbreviation for between, but I don't recall ever seeing b/w.
> OTOH, I have seen b/w used for bandwidth.
>
Here, it means between. Will remove the abbreviation since it might be
confusing.
>
> > +
> > +
> > +----------------- -----------------
> > +| | | c1, c2, c3 |
> > +| ACPI | register to cpuidle | (current) |
> > +| discovery |-------------------------------------> |---------------|
> > +| | with c1, c2, c3 | mwait |
> > +| | as set of idle routines | |
> > +----------------- -----------------
> > +
> > +With this mechanism, a module can register and unregister its set of
> > +idle routines at run time in a clean manner.
> > +
> > +The main idle routine called inside cpu_idle() of every arch is defined in
> > +driver/cpuidle/cpuidle.c which would in turn call the idle routine selected
>
> drivers/
>
noted.
thanks
arun
> > +by the governor. If the CONFIG_CPU_IDLE is disabled, the arch needs to
> > +provide an alternate definition for cpuidle_idle_call().
>
>
> --
> ~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-10 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-09 8:28 [v11 PATCH 0/9]: cpuidle: cleanup cpuidle/ introduce cpuidle to POWER Arun R Bharadwaj
2010-02-09 8:29 ` [v11 PATCH 1/9]: cpuidle: Design documentation patch Arun R Bharadwaj
2010-02-09 17:00 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-02-10 2:13 ` Arun R Bharadwaj [this message]
2010-02-09 8:30 ` [v11 PATCH 2/9]: cpuidle: cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c Arun R Bharadwaj
2010-02-09 8:31 ` [v11 PATCH 3/9]: cpuidle: implement a list based approach to register a set of idle routines Arun R Bharadwaj
2010-02-09 8:32 ` [v11 PATCH 4/9]: x86: refactor x86 idle power management code, remove all instances of pm_idle Arun R Bharadwaj
2010-02-09 8:33 ` [v11 PATCH 5/9]: POWER: enable cpuidle for POWER Arun R Bharadwaj
2010-02-09 8:34 ` [v11 PATCH 6/9]: pSeries/cpuidle: refactor pseries idle loops Arun R Bharadwaj
2010-02-09 8:34 ` [v11 PATCH 7/9]: POWER: add a default_idle idle loop for POWER Arun R Bharadwaj
2010-02-09 8:35 ` [v11 PATCH 8/9]: pSeries: implement pSeries processor idle module Arun R Bharadwaj
2010-02-09 8:36 ` [v11 PATCH 9/9]: POWER: Enable default_idle when power_save=off Arun R Bharadwaj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100210021303.GA5079@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox