From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Simon Raffeiner <sturmflut@lieberbiber.de>,
Andrey Yurovsky <andrey@cozybit.com>,
Javier Cardona <javier@cozybit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nl80211: does not allow NEW_STATION and DEL_STATION for mesh
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:55:36 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100212135535.GA1123@holoscopio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265978993.15701.0.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1898 bytes --]
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 01:49:53PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 10:37 -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > As discussed in linux-wireless mailint list, adding and removing
> > stations for mesh topologies is not necessary. Since doing it triggers
> > bugs, the sugestion was to simply disable it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
> > Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> > Cc: Simon Raffeiner <sturmflut@lieberbiber.de>
> > Cc: Andrey Yurovsky <andrey@cozybit.com>
> > Cc: Javier Cardona <javier@cozybit.com>
> > ---
> > net/wireless/nl80211.c | 47
> > +++++++++++------------------------------------
> > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
> > index 5b79ecf..176b8fe 100644
> > --- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
> > +++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
> > @@ -2001,6 +2001,10 @@ static int nl80211_new_station(struct sk_buff
> > *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> >
> > memset(¶ms, 0, sizeof(params));
> >
> > + if (dev->ieee80211_ptr->iftype != NL80211_IFTYPE_AP &&
> > + dev->ieee80211_ptr->iftype != NL80211_IFTYPE_AP_VLAN)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > if (!info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_MAC])
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> You clearly didn't ever try this code.
>
> johannes
Sorry. This code has obviously given me an oops. I did it in a hurry and
thought that was a good optimization to get out as early as possible in
the case the device was not in AP mode.
I have fixed it, but I would like to do a more thorough test now to make
up for my mistake.
So, is there any test tool around? I am playing with iw code to do
these tests. Any recommendations for the values of listen interval and
the acceptable values for supported rates and aid?
Regards,
Cascardo.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-12 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-12 12:37 [PATCH] nl80211: does not allow NEW_STATION and DEL_STATION for mesh Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2010-02-12 12:49 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-12 13:55 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo [this message]
2010-02-12 14:03 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-12 14:34 ` [PATCH v2] " Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100212135535.GA1123@holoscopio.com \
--to=cascardo@holoscopio.com \
--cc=andrey@cozybit.com \
--cc=javier@cozybit.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sturmflut@lieberbiber.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox