* [PATCH] idr: fix a critical misallocation bug, take#2
@ 2010-02-12 7:16 Tejun Heo
2010-02-12 14:36 ` Serge E. Hallyn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2010-02-12 7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, Greg KH, Eric Paris, lkml, Xiaotian Feng,
Dave Hansen, Serge Hallyn
This is retry of reverted 859ddf09743a8cc680af33f7259ccd0fd36bfe9d
which contained two bugs.
* pa[idp->layers] should be cleared even if it's not used by
sub_alloc() because it's used by mark idr_mark_full().
* The original condition check also assigned pa[l] to p which the new
code didn't do thus leaving p pointing at the wrong layer.
Both problems have been fixed and the idr code has received good
amount testing using userland testing setup where simple bitmap
allocator is run parallel to verify the result of idr allocation.
The bug this patch fixes is caused by sub_alloc() optimization path
bypassing out-of-room condition check and restarting allocation loop
with starting value higher than maximum allowed value. For detailed
description, please read commit message of 859ddf09.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Based-on-patch-from: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@gmx.de>
---
Heh... Embarrassingly, it turns out Eric's original patch is correct
and all I did was adding two mistakes. :-) I'm pretty sure this is the
correct fix and have tested it quite extensively. But, given the
fragility of this thing, Andrew, can you please put it in your tree
and push it after 2.6.33 merge window opens? Greg, please don't put
this into -stable until at least 2.6.33-rc2 seems okay.
Thank you.
lib/idr.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/idr.c b/lib/idr.c
index 1cac726..0dc7822 100644
--- a/lib/idr.c
+++ b/lib/idr.c
@@ -156,10 +156,12 @@ static int sub_alloc(struct idr *idp, int *starting_id, struct idr_layer **pa)
id = (id | ((1 << (IDR_BITS * l)) - 1)) + 1;
/* if already at the top layer, we need to grow */
- if (!(p = pa[l])) {
+ if (id >= 1 << (idp->layers * IDR_BITS)) {
*starting_id = id;
return IDR_NEED_TO_GROW;
}
+ p = pa[l];
+ BUG_ON(!p);
/* If we need to go up one layer, continue the
* loop; otherwise, restart from the top.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] idr: fix a critical misallocation bug, take#2
2010-02-12 7:16 [PATCH] idr: fix a critical misallocation bug, take#2 Tejun Heo
@ 2010-02-12 14:36 ` Serge E. Hallyn
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2010-02-12 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: Andrew Morton, Greg KH, Eric Paris, lkml, Xiaotian Feng,
Dave Hansen
Quoting Tejun Heo (tj@kernel.org):
> This is retry of reverted 859ddf09743a8cc680af33f7259ccd0fd36bfe9d
> which contained two bugs.
>
> * pa[idp->layers] should be cleared even if it's not used by
> sub_alloc() because it's used by mark idr_mark_full().
>
> * The original condition check also assigned pa[l] to p which the new
> code didn't do thus leaving p pointing at the wrong layer.
>
> Both problems have been fixed and the idr code has received good
> amount testing using userland testing setup where simple bitmap
> allocator is run parallel to verify the result of idr allocation.
>
> The bug this patch fixes is caused by sub_alloc() optimization path
> bypassing out-of-room condition check and restarting allocation loop
> with starting value higher than maximum allowed value. For detailed
> description, please read commit message of 859ddf09.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Based-on-patch-from: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@gmx.de>
Full LTP still running, but this passes semget05 which is what
crashed the last version. So that's
Tested-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
> ---
> Heh... Embarrassingly, it turns out Eric's original patch is correct
> and all I did was adding two mistakes. :-) I'm pretty sure this is the
> correct fix and have tested it quite extensively. But, given the
> fragility of this thing, Andrew, can you please put it in your tree
> and push it after 2.6.33 merge window opens? Greg, please don't put
> this into -stable until at least 2.6.33-rc2 seems okay.
>
> Thank you.
>
> lib/idr.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/idr.c b/lib/idr.c
> index 1cac726..0dc7822 100644
> --- a/lib/idr.c
> +++ b/lib/idr.c
> @@ -156,10 +156,12 @@ static int sub_alloc(struct idr *idp, int *starting_id, struct idr_layer **pa)
> id = (id | ((1 << (IDR_BITS * l)) - 1)) + 1;
>
> /* if already at the top layer, we need to grow */
> - if (!(p = pa[l])) {
> + if (id >= 1 << (idp->layers * IDR_BITS)) {
> *starting_id = id;
> return IDR_NEED_TO_GROW;
> }
> + p = pa[l];
> + BUG_ON(!p);
>
> /* If we need to go up one layer, continue the
> * loop; otherwise, restart from the top.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-12 14:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-12 7:16 [PATCH] idr: fix a critical misallocation bug, take#2 Tejun Heo
2010-02-12 14:36 ` Serge E. Hallyn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox