From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754758Ab0BRBPF (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:15:05 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43107 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752712Ab0BRBPB (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:15:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:12:49 -0800 From: Greg KH To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Neil Brown , Greg KH , Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: differentiate between locking links and non-links Message-ID: <20100218011248.GA2393@suse.de> References: <19314.1869.847327.15190@notabene.brown> <20100210230625.GB678@suse.de> <20100211223235.GC30430@suse.de> <20100217223848.GA31557@kroah.com> <20100218113912.4a3d36e9@notabene.brown> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 05:01:50PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Neil Brown writes: > > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:38:48 -0800 > > Greg KH wrote: > > >> Got it, I've fixed this by hand. > >> > >> > > > > Thanks. > > I hadn't sent you a fix myself (As requested) as I got the impression from > > the following discussion that a different approach would be taken. > > > > I'm happy either way though. > > I had the same impression. > > For simplicity I didn't base my patches on Neils because I would just > have had to undo it when I modified directories and symlinks to not > mess with s_active. Argh, sorry about that, I'll go drop Neil's patch and queue up Eric's instead. I was working my way through the patch queue and hadn't gotten to Eric's just yet... thanks, greg k-h