public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 rwsem optimization extreme
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:29:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100218092907.GC5964@basil.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B7CF95A.4040706@redhat.com>

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:24:58PM -1000, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>>
>> Zachary Amsden<zamsden@redhat.com>  writes
>>> Incidentally, the cost of putting all the rwsem code inline, using the
>>> straightforward approach, for git-tip, using defconfig on x86_64 is
>>> 3565 bytes / 20971778 bytes total, or 0.0168%, using gcc 4.4.3.
>>>      
>> The nice advantage of putting lock code inline is that it gets
>> accounted to the caller in all profilers.
>>
>> -Andi
>>
>>    
>
> Unfortunately, only for the uncontended case.  The hot case still ends up 
> in a call to the lock text section.

I removed those some time ago because it breaks unwinding.
Did that get undone?

-Andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-18  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-17 21:58 [PATCH] x86 rwsem optimization extreme Zachary Amsden
2010-02-17 22:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-17 22:29   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-17 23:29   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-18  1:03     ` Zachary Amsden
2010-02-18  1:53     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-18  1:59       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-18  4:25         ` Zachary Amsden
2010-02-18  8:12           ` Andi Kleen
2010-02-18  8:24             ` Zachary Amsden
2010-02-18  9:29               ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2010-02-18 10:55               ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100218092907.GC5964@basil.fritz.box \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zamsden@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox