From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani@redhat.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Maneesh Soni <maneesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hw-breakpoint: Keep track of dr7 local enable bits
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:41:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100219174150.GD4921@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100219085831.GA10837@in.ibm.com>
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 02:28:31PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 07:00:01PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> > index 017d937..0c1033d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> > @@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ static unsigned long ptrace_get_debugreg(struct task_struct *tsk, int n)
> > } else if (n == 6) {
> > val = thread->debugreg6;
> > } else if (n == 7) {
> > - val = ptrace_get_dr7(thread->ptrace_bps);
> > + val = thread->ptrace_dr7;
>
> Some more comments that I missed out in the previous mail...
>
> Shouldn't ptrace_get_dr7() function be entirely removed now, given that
> its only caller no longer invokes it?
>
> > }
> > return val;
> > }
> > @@ -778,8 +778,11 @@ int ptrace_set_debugreg(struct task_struct *tsk, int n, unsigned long val)
> > return rc;
> > }
> > /* All that's left is DR7 */
> > - if (n == 7)
> > + if (n == 7) {
> > rc = ptrace_write_dr7(tsk, val);
>
> And ptrace_write_dr7() should be made to populate thread->ptrace_dr7 if
> it is going to return a success.
>
> > + if (!rc)
> > + thread->ptrace_dr7 = val;
> > + }
> >
> > ret_path:
> > return rc;
> > --
> > 1.6.2.3
> >
>
> Thanks,
> K.Prasad
>
This is urgent so I'm pushing the two patches right away as they fix the
regression and are not intrusive.
Let's further improve that later, for a merge window, ok?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-19 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-11 16:33 Regression in ptrace (Wine) starting with 2.6.33-rc1 Michael Stefaniuc
2010-02-11 18:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-11 19:49 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2010-02-12 18:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-13 17:33 ` K.Prasad
2010-02-13 21:29 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2010-02-14 17:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-14 20:13 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2010-02-14 20:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-14 23:05 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2010-02-15 11:57 ` K.Prasad
2010-02-15 15:57 ` Alexandre Julliard
2010-02-15 19:37 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2010-02-15 19:47 ` Roland McGrath
2010-02-17 16:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-17 17:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-18 17:59 ` Regression in ptrace (Wine) starting with 2.6.33-rc1, fixes Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-18 19:27 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2010-02-18 19:41 ` Alexandre Julliard
2010-02-19 17:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-19 17:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-18 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] hw-breakpoints: Accept breakpoints on NULL address Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-18 21:16 ` Roland McGrath
2010-02-19 17:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-19 8:51 ` K.Prasad
2010-02-18 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] hw-breakpoint: Keep track of dr7 local enable bits Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-19 8:45 ` K.Prasad
2010-02-19 15:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-19 17:58 ` K.Prasad
2010-02-19 18:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-19 8:58 ` K.Prasad
2010-02-19 15:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-19 17:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-02-19 18:04 ` K.Prasad
2010-02-19 18:12 ` [GIT PULL] hw-breakpoint regression fixes Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-22 9:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-19 18:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] hw-breakpoints: Accept breakpoints on NULL address Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-19 18:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] hw-breakpoint: Keep track of dr7 local enable bits Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100219174150.GD4921@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=julliard@winehq.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
--cc=maneesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mstefani@redhat.com \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).