public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Benjamin S." <sbenni@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [git patch] atang tree: fix 2.6.32 SSD performance regression
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:36:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002231336.04901.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100223122320.GZ1025@kernel.dk>

On Tuesday 23 February 2010 01:23:20 pm Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 February 2010 07:23:24 am Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 22 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > DISCLAIMER: the fact of getting patches merged into atang tree means
> > > > that from now on they will be getting updates for changes happening
> > > > in atang tree and it should not be treated as an indication regarding
> > > > decisions taken by 'upstream' kernel trees
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Fix 2.6.32 regression bringing back the desired SSD performance.
> > > > 
> > > > [ 'upstream' may want to wait for a proper resolution, for atang tree
> > > >   performance of big non-ATA boxes owned by a very few people is not
> > > >   of such a big concern as a major regression on a commodity hardware ]
> > > 
> > > What is the point of this, other than continuing your past history of
> > > political tirades?
> > 
> > I worry that you may be reading too much into it -- I don't use Linus'
> > tree or linux-next tree any longer so the next kernel I would see fix
> > for the issue is most likely 2.6.34 and there is a little point from my
> > personal perspective in waiting for such long time..
> 
> It'll go into 2.6.33, I already prepared an updated for-linus branch
> this morning and will send it out later today.

Great!  I'll just drop my patch during re-base to 2.6.33 then..

--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

      reply	other threads:[~2010-02-23 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-22 21:24 [git patch] atang tree: fix 2.6.32 SSD performance regression Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2010-02-23  6:23 ` Jens Axboe
2010-02-23 12:17   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2010-02-23 12:23     ` Jens Axboe
2010-02-23 12:36       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201002231336.04901.bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sbenni@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox