public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
	linux-pm <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Is it supposed to be ok to call del_gendisk while userspace is frozen?
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:12:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100224191213.GH1025@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1002241051470.2436-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

On Wed, Feb 24 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
> > > > And that's back to the question of whether or not that is a nice thing to
> > > > do. It seems a bit dirty, but otoh where else to do it. Perhaps just
> > > > using the kblockd to postpone the del_gendisk() to out-of-resume context
> > > > would be the best approach.
> > > 
> > > That would involve a layering violation, wouldn't it?  Either the 
> > > driver would have to interface with kblockd directly, or else 
> > > del_gendisk() would need to know whether the writeback task was frozen.
> > > 
> > > On the whole, I think it's best for the block layer to retain full
> > > control over its own tasks and requirements.
> > 
> > You would export such functionality - del_gendisk_deferred(), or
> > something like that. The kblockd suggestion was implementation detail,
> > not something the driver would concern itself with. It's not exactly
> > picture perfect, but it could be used from eg resume context where the
> > device isn't fully live yet.
> 
> Hmm.  There's still no way for the driver to know whether or not the
> writeback task is frozen when it wants to call del_gendisk().  It
> would have to defer _all_ such calls.  And all hot-pluggable block
> drivers would have to do this -- would that be acceptable?

I was assuming it knew it was being called from a critical location,
like from resume. I guess the callback just iterates the bus devices and
calls the device remove, so that doesn't quite work without other
changes.

> How about plugging the request queue instead of freezing the writeback 
> task?  Would that work?  It should be easy enough for a driver to 
> unplug the queue before unregistering its device from within a resume 
> method.

We have specific methods for either freezing of stopping or starting the
queue, perhaps those would be appropriate for suspend/resume actions. It
effectively prevents the queueing function from being called. If there
are dirty pages for the device, then it would not help though, as you
would still get stuck waiting for that IO to complete.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-24 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-13 13:29 Is it supposed to be ok to call del_gendisk while userspace is frozen? Maxim Levitsky
2010-02-15 16:00 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-02-15 21:04   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-16 16:27     ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2010-02-20 22:22       ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-02-23 12:33       ` Jens Axboe
2010-02-23 15:29         ` Alan Stern
2010-02-23 15:58           ` Jens Axboe
2010-02-23 16:33             ` Alan Stern
2010-02-23 22:16               ` Jens Axboe
2010-02-24 15:59                 ` Alan Stern
2010-02-24 19:12                   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2010-02-24 20:19                     ` Alan Stern
2010-02-23 16:42             ` Testing for dirty buffers on a block device Alan Stern
2010-02-23 22:13               ` Jens Axboe
2010-02-24 15:51                 ` Alan Stern
2010-02-24 19:09                   ` Jens Axboe
2010-02-24 20:09                     ` Alan Stern
2010-02-25  8:20                       ` Jens Axboe
2010-02-25 22:19                         ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-01  6:35           ` [linux-pm] Is it supposed to be ok to call del_gendisk while userspace is frozen? Pavel Machek
2010-03-01 15:23             ` Alan Stern
2010-03-03 21:50               ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-03 22:23                 ` Alan Stern
2010-03-04  0:23                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-04  2:48                     ` Alan Stern
2010-03-04 19:26                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-04 19:36                         ` Alan Stern
2010-03-04 20:04                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-04 20:15                         ` Pavel Machek
2010-04-22 23:40                           ` Matt Reimer
2010-04-23  5:17                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-11 23:55                               ` Matt Reimer
2010-05-12 14:50                                 ` Alan Stern
2010-05-13 21:44                                   ` Matt Reimer
2010-05-13 21:54                                     ` Alan Stern
2010-05-13 22:20                                       ` Matt Reimer
2010-05-13 22:47                                         ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-05-15  2:37                                           ` Alan Stern
2010-05-15  2:53                                             ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-05-16 19:35                                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-15  2:32                                         ` Alan Stern
2010-05-15 20:30                                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-16  7:49                                             ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-05-16 19:38                                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-16 21:32                                                 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-05-17  2:22                                                   ` Alan Stern
2010-05-17  7:45                                                     ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-05-17 20:35                                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-17 22:51                                                         ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-05-18 19:43                                                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-18 20:06                                                             ` Alan Stern
2010-05-24 19:02                                                           ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-24 21:21                                                             ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-04 13:53                   ` Pavel Machek
2010-06-04 11:20                     ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-04 14:59                       ` Alan Stern
2010-06-04 15:19                         ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-04 17:52                           ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100224191213.GH1025@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox