From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Luca Barbieri <luca@luca-barbieri.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86-32: improve atomic64_t functions (v2)
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:14:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100226101423.GA25641@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff13bc9a1002240156x27e28764mb6ba24da0b125d81@mail.gmail.com>
* Luca Barbieri <luca@luca-barbieri.com> wrote:
> > I wonder if I could ask you to recreate your patchset on top of the
> > x86/asm branch in the -tip tree.
>
> Done, resent.
FYI, it triggered build failures in -tip testing:
lib/atomic64_test.c: In function 'test_atomic64':
lib/atomic64_test.c:116: error: implicit declaration of function 'atomic64_dec_if_positive'
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-26 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-19 17:26 [PATCH 0/5] x86-32: improve atomic64_t functions (v2) Luca Barbieri
2010-02-19 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: add support for relative CALL and JMP in alternatives (v2) Luca Barbieri
2010-02-19 17:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: add support for lock prefix " Luca Barbieri
2010-02-19 17:26 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86-32: allow UP/SMP lock replacement in cmpxchg64 (v2) Luca Barbieri
2010-02-19 17:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] lib: add self-test for atomic64_t Luca Barbieri
2010-02-19 17:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86-32: rewrite 32-bit atomic64 functions in assembly (v2) Luca Barbieri
2010-02-23 22:47 ` [PATCH 0/5] x86-32: improve atomic64_t functions (v2) H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-24 9:56 ` Luca Barbieri
2010-02-26 10:14 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-02-26 11:08 ` Luca Barbieri
2010-02-26 11:23 ` Luca Barbieri
2010-03-01 7:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-01 8:49 ` Paul Mackerras
2010-03-01 17:16 ` Luca Barbieri
2010-03-01 17:31 ` Luca Barbieri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100226101423.GA25641@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca@luca-barbieri.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox