From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: "Stephen M. Cameron" <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, james.bottomley@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, brace@beardog.cce.hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] cciss driver SCSI updates
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:43:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100228184353.GG5768@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100226220023.11979.4999.stgit@beardog.cce.hp.com>
On Fri, Feb 26 2010, Stephen M. Cameron wrote:
> The following series mainly fixes the scsi tape code in the cciss
> driver to take advantage of more scatter gather elements, enabling
> larger transfer sizes. The first eight patches are mainly cleaning
> things up and getting ready for the 9th patch, which enables the
> SCSI half of the driver to use more than 31 scatter gather elements.
>
> I've tested on 32-bit and 64-bit systems, and written out tapes
> with block sizes up to 2Mb.
>
> These patches are vs. Jens's linux-2.6-block tree.
Thanks Stephen, applied.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-28 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-26 22:01 [PATCH 0/9] cciss driver SCSI updates Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 1/9] cciss: clarify command list padding calculation Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 2/9] cciss: detect bad alignment of scsi commands at build time Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 3/9] cciss: factor out scatter gather chain block allocation and freeing Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 4/9] cciss: simplify scatter gather code Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] cciss: fix scatter gather chain block dma direction kludge Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] cciss: factor out scatter gather chain block mapping code Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 7/9] cciss: do not use void pointer for scsi hba data Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 8/9] cciss: eliminate unnecessary pointer use in cciss scsi code Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 9/9] cciss: Fix problem with scatter gather elements in the scsi half of the driver Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-28 18:43 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100228184353.GG5768@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brace@beardog.cce.hp.com \
--cc=james.bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com \
--cc=scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox