From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"czoccolo@gmail.com" <czoccolo@gmail.com>,
"vgoyal@redhat.com" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
"jmoyer@redhat.com" <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
"guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com" <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: quantum check tweak --resend
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 09:19:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100301081920.GQ5768@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100301081524.GA28563@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
On Mon, Mar 01 2010, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 04:02:34PM +0800, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 01 2010, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > Currently a queue can only dispatch up to 4 requests if there are other queues.
> > > This isn't optimal, device can handle more requests, for example, AHCI can
> > > handle 31 requests. I can understand the limit is for fairness, but we could
> > > do a tweak: if the queue still has a lot of slice left, sounds we could
> > > ignore the limit. Test shows this boost my workload (two thread randread of
> > > a SSD) from 78m/s to 100m/s.
> > > Thanks for suggestions from Corrado and Vivek for the patch.
> >
> > As mentioned before, I think we definitely want to ensure that we drive
> > the full queue depth whenever possible. I think your patch is a bit
> > dangerous, though. The problematic workload here is a buffered write,
> > interleaved with the occasional sync reader. If the sync reader has to
> > endure 32 requests every time, latency rises dramatically for him.
> the patch still matains a hardlimit for dispatched request. For a async,
> the limit is cfq_slice_async/cfq_slice_idle = 5. For sync, the limit is 8.
> And we only pipe out such number of requests at the begining of a slice.
> For the workload you mentioned here, we only dispatch 1 extra request.
OK, that sound appropriate. Final question - why change the quantum and
use quantum/2?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-01 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-01 1:50 [PATCH] cfq-iosched: quantum check tweak --resend Shaohua Li
2010-03-01 8:02 ` Jens Axboe
2010-03-01 8:15 ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-01 8:19 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2010-03-01 8:22 ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-01 8:25 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100301081920.GQ5768@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=czoccolo@gmail.com \
--cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox