From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751933Ab0CATBJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:01:09 -0500 Received: from rcsinet11.oracle.com ([148.87.113.123]:41747 "EHLO rcsinet11.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751298Ab0CATBH (ORCPT >); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:01:07 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:33:27 -0500 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Yinghai Lu , Ingo Molnar , linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com, garyhade@us.ibm.com, iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, trenn@suse.de Subject: Re: [LKML] Re: [LKML] Re: [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order gsi -- add remap_ioapic_gsi_to_irq() Message-ID: <20100301183327.GB31926@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <4B882182.4030205@kernel.org> <20100227130113.GA18661@elte.hu> <4B897537.5050406@kernel.org> <20100301164602.GG7881@phenom.dumpdata.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Source-IP: acsmt353.oracle.com [141.146.40.153] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090208.4B8C0E0E.020A:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:44:23AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes: > > >> > >> > so far this patch only affect (fix ) x3950. > > > > .. snip .. > >> > other solution will ask IBM to fix their bios, so we can get > > > > It isn't just IBM. Asus P2B-D (PIIX4) and SuperMicro X8DAL (possibly) > > seem to have the same issue. > > > > (http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-02/msg00715.html) > > and > > (http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-02/msg01239.html) > > I can't find the reference to those boards in the email you quoted. Xen Might have to hit the past button a couple of times. Anyway, here is the first description of the problem: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-01/msg01049.html and the board name. > does strange and very different things with it's irqs so it is unlikely to > be the same issue. I think I am confusing the patches. Adding in this patch: [PATCH 01/35] x86: fix sci on ioapic 1 which was posted by Yinghai Lu on Feb 9th fixed the issue with the ASUS board. and the discussion here is for a different patch, so I think I am raising unnecessary noise here - sorry about that.