public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
	dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, josh@joshtriplett.org,
	dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: suppress RCU lockdep warnings during early boot
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:55:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100302145544.GA6786@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100302141257.GA28917@elte.hu>

On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 03:12:57PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 01:20:59PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > +	if (!rcu_scheduler_active || !debug_locks)
> > > > +		return 1;
> > > > +	return lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map);
> > > 
> > > > +	if (!rcu_scheduler_active || !debug_locks)
> > > > +		return 1;
> > > > +	return lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
> > > 
> > > i guess there could be a common helper here?
> > 
> > Will do!
> > 
> > > Also, could we clear rcu_scheduler_active when we clear debug_locks? That way 
> > > only a single test is needed, a generic 'is lock debugging active'.
> > 
> > Doing that will break synchronize_rcu(), which returns immediately if
> > !rcu_scheduler_active.
> 
> Ok - then have an debug_rcu flag which is cleared appropriately - so that the 
> fastpath impact is reduced?

Good point, will do!

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-02 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-01 19:03 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/2] rcu: make RCU lockdep handle early boot in organized manner Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-01 19:03 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: suppress RCU lockdep warnings during early boot Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-02 12:20   ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-02 13:27     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-02 14:12       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-02 14:55         ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-03-01 19:03 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/2] rcu: revert 1883c79a: early boot now handled by lockdep-RCU Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100302145544.GA6786@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox