From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, josh@joshtriplett.org,
dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: suppress RCU lockdep warnings during early boot
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:55:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100302145544.GA6786@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100302141257.GA28917@elte.hu>
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 03:12:57PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 01:20:59PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > + if (!rcu_scheduler_active || !debug_locks)
> > > > + return 1;
> > > > + return lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map);
> > >
> > > > + if (!rcu_scheduler_active || !debug_locks)
> > > > + return 1;
> > > > + return lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
> > >
> > > i guess there could be a common helper here?
> >
> > Will do!
> >
> > > Also, could we clear rcu_scheduler_active when we clear debug_locks? That way
> > > only a single test is needed, a generic 'is lock debugging active'.
> >
> > Doing that will break synchronize_rcu(), which returns immediately if
> > !rcu_scheduler_active.
>
> Ok - then have an debug_rcu flag which is cleared appropriately - so that the
> fastpath impact is reduced?
Good point, will do!
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-02 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-01 19:03 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/2] rcu: make RCU lockdep handle early boot in organized manner Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-01 19:03 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: suppress RCU lockdep warnings during early boot Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-02 12:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-02 13:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-02 14:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-02 14:55 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-03-01 19:03 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/2] rcu: revert 1883c79a: early boot now handled by lockdep-RCU Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100302145544.GA6786@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox