From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753792Ab0CCAHy (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:07:54 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58431 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751661Ab0CCAHu (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:07:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:02:05 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Ari Entlich Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 34/36] tty: Add a new VT mode which is like VT_PROCESS but doesn't require a VT_RELDISP ioctl call Message-ID: <20100303000205.GA2891@suse.de> References: <14018832.317861267574035528.JavaMail.root@zimbra> <12806278.317911267574120161.JavaMail.root@zimbra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12806278.317911267574120161.JavaMail.root@zimbra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 06:55:20PM -0500, Ari Entlich wrote: > Hello! > > Could you please remove this patch from your 2.6.34 tty pull request? > Andrew Morton questioned whether this should actually be used yet[1], > and I responded confirming his suspicions[2]. In addition, this patch > has not "been in the linux-next and -mm releases for a number of > weeks now", as you suggest in your pull request. Hm, it's been there for over a week from what I can tell, right? I'll revert it after this batch goes into Linus's tree. Next time, warn me a bit earlier :) thanks, greg k-h