From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zippel@linux-m68k.org,
mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] kconfig: place git SHA1 in .config output if in git tree
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 01:42:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003030142.43310.elendil@planet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100303000134.GD6786@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wednesday 03 March 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be more logical to include the line in the dmesg output?
> > My preference would be a separate line below the existing (Linux
> > version) line. That line could only be output if the kernel was built
> > from a VCS. It could then even be repeated in oops output.
>
> My concern with only putting it in the dmesg output is that people do
> not always capture that. The oops output is more often captured, but
> the kernel only has this information if CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO is set.
Yes, my suggestion is exactly because IMO it should be independent of
CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO.
I hugely dislike that option because it makes the git version part of the
kernel version and thus affects how the kernel gets installed (names of
files in /boot, name of the directory in /lib/modules, name of the Debian
package created using the deb-pkg target, etc.).
For all those things I want a "clean" kernel version and thus I will never
enable CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO.
But I do see the value of a reliable and consistent identification of what
exact source a kernel was built from. Including the git version separately
from the kernel version would allow that.
Cheers,
FJP
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-03 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-01 4:22 [PATCH RFC] kconfig: place git SHA1 in .config output if in git tree Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-01 8:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-01 9:42 ` Frans Pop
2010-03-01 10:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-03-01 16:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-01 16:53 ` Frans Pop
2010-03-01 18:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-01 20:29 ` Frans Pop
2010-03-02 1:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-02 15:19 ` Frans Pop
2010-03-03 0:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-03 0:42 ` Frans Pop [this message]
2010-03-03 2:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-01 16:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-01 16:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-01 20:46 ` James Cloos
2010-03-02 1:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-02 1:53 ` James Cloos
2010-03-02 5:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003030142.43310.elendil@planet.nl \
--to=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox