Re: board/device file names, and machine names

Re: board/device file names, and machine names

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > > > > Given the amount of discussion there's already been, I'm going to come
> > > > > down hard on this issue to kill the discussion.

> > So... dwalker is maintainer of arch-msm, and does not like the
> > codenames. Then you come, and just because are maintainer of arm,
> > override the decision, without even notifying l-k?
> 
> So you don't think that Daniel, who was *explicitly* asking for my
> suggestions and opinions, is entitled to a clear and straight
> answer?

When someone asks for your suggestions, you can "go down hard on this
issue"?

Note that board_dream.c is already in the tree.

> Yes, go back and read the fucking thread properly Pavel.  Daniel
> explicitly sent his messages TO me and ASKED me for this.
> 
> Daniel had my suggestions on my first reply in this thread, and his
> follow up to that indicated he wanted something firmer - he wanted
> a decision _FROM ME_ on which way to go.  That's precisely what he
> got.
> 
> What you're actually trying to say is that you don't like me and you
> certainly don't like me making any kind of decision.  Get over it, or
> find some other project to infiltrate and infest with your idiotic
> attitude.

Stop putting words in my mouth. And start to behave.
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Re: board/device file names, and machine names

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:18:00AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> > > > > > Given the amount of discussion there's already been, I'm going to come
> > > > > > down hard on this issue to kill the discussion.
> 
> > > So... dwalker is maintainer of arch-msm, and does not like the
> > > codenames. Then you come, and just because are maintainer of arm,
> > > override the decision, without even notifying l-k?
> > 
> > So you don't think that Daniel, who was *explicitly* asking for my
> > suggestions and opinions, is entitled to a clear and straight
> > answer?
> 
> When someone asks for your suggestions, you can "go down hard on this
> issue"?

It's clear that all you want to have is an argument.  This ends here.

Re: board/device file names, and machine names

[Pavel Machek]

On Wed 2010-03-03 10:19:57, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:18:00AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > > > > > > Given the amount of discussion there's already been, I'm going to come
> > > > > > > down hard on this issue to kill the discussion.
> > 
> > > > So... dwalker is maintainer of arch-msm, and does not like the
> > > > codenames. Then you come, and just because are maintainer of arm,
> > > > override the decision, without even notifying l-k?
> > > 
> > > So you don't think that Daniel, who was *explicitly* asking for my
> > > suggestions and opinions, is entitled to a clear and straight
> > > answer?
> > 
> > When someone asks for your suggestions, you can "go down hard on this
> > issue"?
> 
> It's clear that all you want to have is an argument.  This ends here.

It's clear that all I want is reasonable arm maintainer.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html