From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754648Ab0CCOYr (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:24:47 -0500 Received: from ksp.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.206]:34665 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754492Ab0CCOYq (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:24:46 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:24:38 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Daniel Walker , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, swetland@google.com, kernel list Subject: Re: board/device file names, and machine names Message-ID: <20100303142437.GA1740@ucw.cz> References: <1267565398.8759.77.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <20100302235137.GC29715@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1267576760.8759.164.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <20100303084244.GD29715@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100303091728.GA31740@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20100303094757.GB22482@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100303100022.GA7175@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20100303100847.GA30607@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100303101759.GA10499@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20100303101957.GA9848@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100303101957.GA9848@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 2010-03-03 10:19:57, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:18:00AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > Given the amount of discussion there's already been, I'm going to come > > > > > > > down hard on this issue to kill the discussion. > > > > > > So... dwalker is maintainer of arch-msm, and does not like the > > > > codenames. Then you come, and just because are maintainer of arm, > > > > override the decision, without even notifying l-k? > > > > > > So you don't think that Daniel, who was *explicitly* asking for my > > > suggestions and opinions, is entitled to a clear and straight > > > answer? > > > > When someone asks for your suggestions, you can "go down hard on this > > issue"? > > It's clear that all you want to have is an argument. This ends here. It's clear that all I want is reasonable arm maintainer. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html