From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754344Ab0CEPnf (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:43:35 -0500 Received: from light.bluelinux.co.uk ([195.10.223.138]:38141 "EHLO light.bluelinux.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754279Ab0CEPnb (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:43:31 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:17:54 +0200 From: Daniel Stone To: David Miller Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, skeggsb@gmail.com, airlied@linux.ie, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, dri-devel@lists.sf.net, mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 3 Message-ID: <20100305151754.GB2505@tempa> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Stone , David Miller , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, skeggsb@gmail.com, airlied@linux.ie, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, dri-devel@lists.sf.net, mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org References: <1267748927.3496.6.camel@nisroch> <20100305064955.GA6453@elte.hu> <20100305123834.0d9c6277@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100305.063718.211238119.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100305.063718.211238119.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 06:37:18AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > If it effects such a large number of people, which this noveau thing > does, it's entirely relevant to everyone. And the way it's breaking > and making kernel development difficult for so many people matters to > us. Maybe the lesson to be learned from all this is, 'if the developers don't want something merged because they're not ready and forsee huge problems in the future, actually listen to them instead of blindly ramming it in regardless'? But maybe that's just me. Cheers, Daniel --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuRIKIACgkQUVYB1rKAgJSG1ACfb/Pk31VskGM3vHOhu1elVufk pKgAoJCCvdebpFdg+3Pw5BbQCcgy920V =PO1Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc--