From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754761Ab0CIPgK (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:36:10 -0500 Received: from s15228384.onlinehome-server.info ([87.106.30.177]:50643 "EHLO mail.x86-64.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751775Ab0CIPgH (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:36:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:36:28 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Michal Marek , linux-kbuild , Andrew Morton , Wu Fengguang , LKML , Jamie Lokier , Roland Dreier , Al Viro , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Ingo Molnar , Brian Gerst Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add optimized popcnt variants Message-ID: <20100309153628.GA2371@aftab> References: <20100223155852.GF30382@aftab> <4B84118C.90203@zytor.com> <20100223175457.GA2401@aftab> <4B841BC3.1000908@zytor.com> <20100223190614.GB2401@aftab> <4B875BBD.4060104@zytor.com> <20100226074714.GA15310@aftab> <4B88097E.7010608@zytor.com> <20100227082807.GA21706@aftab> <4B8979DA.9000201@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B8979DA.9000201@zytor.com> Organization: Advanced Micro Devices =?iso-8859-1?Q?GmbH?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=2C_Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str=2E_34=2C_85609_Dornach_bei_M=FC?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?nchen=2C_Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer=3A_Thomas_M=2E_McCoy=2C_Giuli?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ano_Meroni=2C_Andrew_Bowd=2C_Sitz=3A_Dornach=2C_Gemeinde_A?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?schheim=2C_Landkreis_M=FCnchen=2C_Registergericht_M=FCnche?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?n=2C?= HRB Nr. 43632 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On 02/27/2010 12:28 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Yeah, let's give it another round of testing and queue it for .35 - > > AFAIR Ingo runs also a wide testing effort so it spending another cycle > > in -tip and being hammered on by us could give us a bit more certainty. > > > > Yes, if we can get into -tip then we'll get more test coverage, so I'll > queue it up for .35 as soon as the merge window closes. Please remind > me if I forget. Hi Peter, I see that you've added the HWEIGHT-capitalized interfaces for compile-time constants with fce877e3. Which means, the bits in from your original patch at http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/4/119 need changing (or have changed already but I've missed them). IOW, where can I get the current version of that last patch so that I can base my __arch_hweightXX stuff ontop of it for testing? Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. - Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Operating Systems Research Center