From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755532Ab0CIScl (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:32:41 -0500 Received: from g6t0184.atlanta.hp.com ([15.193.32.61]:22300 "EHLO g6t0184.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751107Ab0CIScj (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:32:39 -0500 X-IMAP-Sender: achiang Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:32:27 -0700 X-OfflineIMAP-x2122322631-6c646c-494e424f582e4f7574626f78: 1268159558-0998911378209-v6.2.0 From: Alex Chiang To: Greg KH Cc: sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] small xhci cleanups Message-ID: <20100309183227.GD15974@grease.lan> References: <20100309174815.29339.96173.stgit@bob.kio> <20100309181413.GB31027@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100309181413.GB31027@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Greg KH : > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:52:43AM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote: > > > USB: xhci: move all debug code under CONFIG_XHCI_HCD_DEBUGGING > > Does this conflict with Sarah's other debugging patch she just sent out? I'm assuming you're talking about this patch: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.general/28681 Yes, we'll definitely have conflicts. If you agree that we should move the debug code under the Kconfig option, then the best course of action would be for Sarah to rebase her work on top of my patches (since they're intrusive). /ac