From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
devel <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Subject: Re: Tuxradar patching article and [PATCH] scripts/cvt_kernel_style.pl
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:16:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100310001638.GA10960@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268179619.1545.95.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 04:06:59PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:41 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:32:06PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > There was an article published recently:
> > > http://www.tuxradar.com/content/newbies-guide-hacking-linux-kernel
> > > that seems to have prompted several new contributors (welcome)
> > > to create style reformatting patches.
> > >
> > > The article recommends running checkpatch and fixing the various
> > > non-conforming style elements the output produces.
> > >
> > > A better solution might be to enhance checkpatch to rewrite the
> > > patch or a file with -f, but that's more than I'd like to do.
> >
> > I _really_ dislike automatic source conversions by a tool and do not
> > recommend doing that at all.
>
> Don't be silly.
>
> You take automatic conversions from tools like coccinelle all
> the time.
Those are sane, as they are tiny and obvious :)
It's the huge "reformat the whole file with indent" type stuff that I
object to.
> What I found poorly written about the article was
> unfortunately you apparently recommend things like:
>
> if (error != -ENODEV) {
> foo();
> bar();
> } else {
> report_error();
> goto exit;
> }
>
> instead of:
>
> if (error == -ENODEV) {
> report_error();
> goto exit;
> }
> foo();
> bar();
Hey, a job as a copyeditor awaits :)
> and the brace removal example was unfortunate because
> it used printk without KERN_<level> without explanation.
>
> I think there wasn't enough emphasis on compiling the new
> patched file with something like a .o or .lst comparison
> to the unmodified source to make sure it was OK to send
> to the list.
One can only do so much in a few thousand words. I'm sorry you disliked
the article, I know the magazine is always looking for new authors.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-10 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-09 23:32 Tuxradar patching article and [PATCH] scripts/cvt_kernel_style.pl Joe Perches
2010-03-09 23:41 ` Greg KH
2010-03-10 0:06 ` Joe Perches
2010-03-10 0:16 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-03-10 0:34 ` Joe Perches
2010-03-10 18:35 ` Stefan Richter
2010-03-10 18:38 ` Joe Perches
2010-03-10 1:22 ` Frans Pop
2010-03-10 3:25 ` [PATCH V2] scripts/cvt_kernel_style.pl: partial "kernel style" pretty-printing Joe Perches
2010-03-24 20:01 ` [PATCH] scripts/cvt_kernel_style.pl: kernel style source code reformatter Joe Perches
2010-03-24 22:31 ` Frans Pop
2010-03-10 18:32 ` Tuxradar patching article and [PATCH] scripts/cvt_kernel_style.pl Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100310001638.GA10960@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox