From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757266Ab0CJVRN (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:17:13 -0500
Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:52874 "EHLO
	cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753581Ab0CJVRI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:17:08 -0500
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:17:04 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Pauli Nieminen <suokkos@gmail.com>, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
       Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>,
       Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
       ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
       pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
       dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Q] How to tell we're using the KMS (during suspend/resume)
	outside the graphics driver
Message-ID: <20100310211704.GA29201@srcf.ucam.org>
References: <201003062236.09801.rjw@sisk.pl> <548cdfc21003100254t5c94aca5u5cf1e9eb29215325@mail.gmail.com> <20100310205618.GA28628@srcf.ucam.org> <201003102215.26232.rjw@sisk.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201003102215.26232.rjw@sisk.pl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:15:26PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 March 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > As far as the ACPI video driver goes, acpi_get_physical_pci_device() 
> > will give you something to work with.
> 
> Hmm.  Did you mean acpi_get_physical_device()?

Ah, no, acpi_get_pci_dev.

> Which acpi_device should I call that for?

The video one. acpi_video_bus_check does something very similar to check 
whether the device actually exists.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org