From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934330Ab0CKS0i (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:26:38 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:37367 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756797Ab0CKS00 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:26:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:26:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20100311.102646.06576136.davem@davemloft.net> To: grant.likely@secretlab.ca Cc: monstr@monstr.eu, gregkh@suse.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, jgarzik@pobox.com, ben-linux@fluff.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, jeremy.kerr@canonical.com, James.Bottomley@suse.de, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] Clean up of_platform drivers From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20100311181604.13103.30088.stgit@angua> References: <20100311181604.13103.30088.stgit@angua> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Grant you've just posted two enormous patch sets at the SAME EXACT TIME to the SAME AREAS of the kernel. One has 37 patches and this one has 27. Not only are these sets enormous, you haven't specified what in the world they are against. The 37 patch set didn't apply cleanly to Linus tree and once I worked through the rejects as best I could it didn't even compile. How are people supposed to test this stuff? :-/