public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hans-Peter Jansen" <hpj@urpla.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: howto combat highly pathologic latencies on a server?
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:15:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003110115.14555.hpj@urpla.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100310181548.GA25684@infradead.org>

On Wednesday 10 March 2010, 19:15:48 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 06:17:42PM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> > While this system usually operates fine, it suffers from delays, that
> > are displayed in latencytop as: "Writing page to disk:     8425,5 ms":
> > ftp://urpla.net/lat-8.4sec.png, but we see them also in the 1.7-4.8 sec
> > range: ftp://urpla.net/lat-1.7sec.png, ftp://urpla.net/lat-2.9sec.png,
> > ftp://urpla.net/lat-4.6sec.png and ftp://urpla.net/lat-4.8sec.png.
> >
> > >From other observations, this issue "feels" like it is induced by
> > > single
> >
> > syncronisation points in the block layer, eg. if I create heavy IO load
> > on one RAID array, say resizing a VMware disk image, it can take up to
> > a minute to log in by ssh, although the ssh login does not touch this
> > area at all (different RAID arrays). Note, that the latencytop
> > snapshots above are made during normal operation, not this kind of
> > load..
>
> I had very similar issues on various systems (mostly using xfs, but some
> with ext3, too) using kernels before ~ 2.6.30 when using the cfq I/O
> scheduler.  Switching to noop fixed that for me, or upgrading to a
> recent kernel where cfq behaves better again.

Christoph, thanks for this valuable suggestion: I've changed it to noop 
right away, and also:

vm.dirty_ratio = 20
vm.dirty_background_ratio = 1

since the defaults of 40 and 10 seem to also not fit my needs. Even the 20 
might be still oversized with 8GB total mem. 

Thanks,
Pete

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-11  0:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-10 17:17 howto combat highly pathologic latencies on a server? Hans-Peter Jansen
2010-03-10 18:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-11  0:15   ` Hans-Peter Jansen [this message]
2010-03-16 14:54     ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2010-03-10 23:29 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-11  0:27   ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2010-03-11 16:58   ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2010-03-13 13:16     ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-10 23:44 ` David Rees
2010-03-11  1:20   ` Hans-Peter Jansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201003110115.14555.hpj@urpla.net \
    --to=hpj@urpla.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox