From: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Zhang,
Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kvm: Show guest system/user cputime in cpustat
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:46:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003111546.44059.sheng@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B989D61.70906@redhat.com>
On Thursday 11 March 2010 15:36:01 Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/11/2010 09:20 AM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > Currently we can only get the cpu_stat of whole guest as one. This patch
> > enhanced cpu_stat with more detail, has guest_system and guest_user cpu
> > time statistics with a little overhead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang<sheng@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > This draft patch based on KVM upstream to show the idea. I would split it
> > into more kernel friendly version later.
> >
> > The overhead is, the cost of get_cpl() after each exit from guest.
>
> This can be very expensive in the nested virtualization case, so I
> wouldn't like this to be in normal paths. I think detailed profiling
> like that can be left to 'perf kvm', which only has overhead if enabled
> at runtime.
Yes, that's my concern too(though nested vmcs/vmcb read already too expensive,
they should be optimized...). The other concern is, perf alike mechanism would
bring a lot more overhead compared to this.
> For example you can put the code to note the cpl in a tracepoint which
> is enabled dynamically.
Yanmin have already implement "perf kvm" to support this. We are just arguing
if a normal top-alike mechanism is necessary.
I am also considering to make it a feature that can be disabled. But seems it
make things complicate and result in uncertain cpustat output.
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-11 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-11 7:20 [PATCH] x86/kvm: Show guest system/user cputime in cpustat Sheng Yang
2010-03-11 7:36 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-11 7:46 ` Sheng Yang [this message]
2010-03-11 7:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-11 8:21 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-03-11 9:17 ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-12 8:53 ` Qing He
2010-03-13 8:26 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003111546.44059.sheng@linux.intel.com \
--to=sheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox