From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86,perf: Implement minimal P4 PMU driver v14
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:50:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100311215016.GG25162@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268343480.5037.145.camel@laptop>
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:38:00PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 00:31 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:24:22PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 00:15 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > >
> > > > Perhaps something like the patch below (tested with kvm)? With this patch
> > > > we will actually waste ~4/8 bytes per PMU (intel,amd,p6) since this call
> > > > hits on p4 only, so I think perhaps better to use one x86 scheduler hook
> > > > instead of empty schedule_events() in PMU, hmm?
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > x86,perf: Fix NULL deref on not assigned x86_pmu
> > > >
> > > > In case of not assigned x86_pmu and software events
> > > > NULL dereference may being hit via x86_pmu::schedule_events
> > > > method.
> > > >
> > > > Fix it by calling x86_pmu::schedule_events only if we
> > > > have one. Otherwise use general scheduler.
> > > >
> > > > Also the former x86_schedule_events calls restored.
> > >
> > > Hrm,.. not sure that makes sense, sure it might not crash anymore, but
> > > its not making much sense to compute anything if we don't have an
> > > initialized x86_pmu.
> > >
> > > Doesn't adding something like:
> > >
> > > if (!x86_pmu_initialized())
> > > return;
> > >
> > > to hw_perf_group_sched_in() make more sense? We seem to do that for all
> > > these weak things except this one.
> > >
> >
> > As far as I see it'll not update tstamp_running then (in x86_event_sched_in).
> > Or I miss somethig?
>
> Have it return 0 and it will fallback to defaults. Since there is no
> initialized x86_pmu there's no point in doing anything x86 specific.
>
I suppose you mean something like below.
-- Cyrill
---
x86,perf: Fix NULL deref on not assigned x86_pmu
In case of not assigned x86_pmu and software events
NULL dereference may being hit via x86_pmu::schedule_events
method.
Fix it by checking if x86_pmu is initialized at all.
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
=====================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1263,6 +1263,9 @@ int hw_perf_group_sched_in(struct perf_e
int assign[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX];
int n0, n1, ret;
+ if (!x86_pmu_initialized())
+ return 0;
+
/* n0 = total number of events */
n0 = collect_events(cpuc, leader, true);
if (n0 < 0)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-11 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-10 18:31 [RFC] x86,perf: Implement minimal P4 PMU driver v14 Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-10 19:29 ` Robert Richter
2010-03-10 19:43 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-11 2:32 ` Lin Ming
2010-03-11 4:12 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-11 16:54 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-11 18:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-11 18:29 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-11 18:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-11 21:15 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-11 21:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-11 21:31 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-11 21:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-11 21:41 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-11 21:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2010-03-12 9:54 ` [tip:perf/x86] x86, perf: Fix NULL deref on not assigned x86_pmu tip-bot for Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-11 18:33 ` [tip:perf/x86] perf, x86: Implement initial P4 PMU driver tip-bot for Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-16 16:07 ` Robert Richter
2010-03-16 16:23 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-17 1:05 ` Lin Ming
2010-03-17 9:48 ` [tip:perf/core] perf, x86: Report error code that returned from x86_pmu.hw_config() tip-bot for Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100311215016.GG25162@lenovo \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox