From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758587Ab0CKWW1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:22:27 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:44942 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758560Ab0CKWWY (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:22:24 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:22:15 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , Mike Galbraith , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] perf report: Initial TUI using newt Message-ID: <20100311222215.GE28421@ghostprotocols.net> References: <1268345617-31863-1-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org> <1268345617-31863-6-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org> <20100311221529.GM14180@ghostprotocols.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100311221529.GM14180@ghostprotocols.net> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 07:15:29PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 07:13:37PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > > > Newt has widespread availability and provides a rather simple API as can be > > seen by the size of this patch. > > > > The work needed to support it will benefit other frontends too. > > > > In this initial patch it just checks if the output is a tty, if not it falls > > back to the previous behaviour, also if newt-devel/libnewt-dev is not installed > > the previous behaviour is maintaned. > > Argh, please don't consider this last patch (6/6), I messed up, will > repost just this one in a few moments. Actually the problem was that 4/6 should be merged with 6/6, so I'm just sending the by now 5 patch series with a v2 tag in some jiffies. Sorry for the confusion, - Arnaldo