From: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
"xen-devel" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com>,
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@eu.citrix.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <kliw@darnok.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/7] xen: Enable event channel of PV extension of HVM
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:23:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003120923.22666.sheng@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003111139390.11570@kaball-desktop>
On Thursday 11 March 2010 19:43:00 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 March 2010 23:29:30 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > > I think we can leave the controversial thing later. At least, we want
> > > > a framework for PV extension of HVM. We can work together to
> > > > determine what is the better way for evtchn, as well as porting
> > > > pirqs. (And the later MSI work may also depends on it)
> > >
> > > Most of my patch series can be upstreamed right now, the only thing
> > > that needs some extra work is the pirq remapping.
> > > So yes, we can upstream the rest and that would also make PV on HVM
> > > work on linux upstream ASAP.
> > > I think that is a worthy goal by itself, therefore I am going to send
> > > another reduced patch series, ready to be upstreamed, without pirq
> > > remappings, with support for PV on HVM.
> >
> > I think my first 6 patches can be used without modification. And I've
> > already spent lots of efforts on them with Jeremy.
> >
> > We can work on evtchn and platform pci later.
>
> Agreed on evtchn but platform pci should be present even in the basic
> version.
> Please read the series "basic PV on HVM support" I posted yesterday
> because I believe has already everything needed to be accepted upstream
> right now; at the same time it introduces the pv clocksource and the
> vector based callback mechanism that is going to be needed for the
> interrupt remapping we are going to work on later on.
>
IIRC, I think your platform PCI driver also depends on evtchn to inject
interrupt?
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-12 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-08 7:18 [PATCH 0/7][v7] PV extension of HVM (Hybrid) for Xen Sheng Yang
2010-03-08 7:18 ` [PATCH 1/7] xen: add support for hvm_op Sheng Yang
2010-03-08 7:18 ` [PATCH 2/7] xen: Import cpuid.h from Xen Sheng Yang
2010-03-08 7:18 ` [PATCH 3/7] xen: Make pv drivers only work with xen_pv_domain() Sheng Yang
2010-03-08 7:18 ` [PATCH 4/7] xen/hvm: Xen PV extension of HVM initialization Sheng Yang
2010-03-08 7:18 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86/xen: The entrance for PV extension of HVM Sheng Yang
2010-03-08 7:18 ` [PATCH 6/7] xen: Enable PV clocksource for HVM Sheng Yang
2010-03-08 7:18 ` [PATCH 7/7] xen: Enable event channel of PV extension of HVM Sheng Yang
2010-03-08 17:00 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-09 1:23 ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-08 17:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-09 1:53 ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-09 7:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-09 9:48 ` Ian Campbell
2010-03-09 10:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-09 19:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-10 3:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-03-10 2:56 ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-10 15:29 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-11 1:34 ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-11 11:43 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-12 1:23 ` Sheng Yang [this message]
2010-03-12 10:47 ` Stefano Stabellini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-05 6:07 [PATCH 0/7][v6] PV extension of HVM (Hybrid) for Xen Sheng Yang
2010-03-05 6:07 ` [PATCH 7/7] xen: Enable event channel of PV extension of HVM Sheng Yang
2010-03-08 22:16 ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-09 5:55 ` Sheng Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003120923.22666.sheng@linux.intel.com \
--to=sheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=kliw@darnok.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).