From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752136Ab0CMFe0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:34:26 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:42399 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751720Ab0CMFeY (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:34:24 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=pojpztA74KndhagXzrtW4mQ6Rq/Hx3q8l0z6I97jGfz3ys0LoPL4vWuypehrcegiwS yyzothW2Np6guqNxhMP7rXHn4S6CFZzGcUOzTH6kNmMAcrsZKMgkO6qtwszp0+r44CsN b/DceYdeDNdd+n/FZq/DzXPFD59FU+UOnhEqk= Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:37:33 +0800 From: =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Li Zefan , Lai Jiangshan , Frederic Weisbecker , =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang , LKML , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: 2.6.33: ftrace triggers soft lockup Message-ID: <20100313053733.GD3704@hack> References: <2375c9f91003042014y17588865g8f9110e666ac2456@mail.gmail.com> <2375c9f91003042316g6e774d60n90dfc4784d3b66bf@mail.gmail.com> <1267801603.10871.1725.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20100305171614.GC5244@nowhere> <4B94A816.4090608@cn.fujitsu.com> <1268061312.10871.1810.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4B95AE4E.6060700@cn.fujitsu.com> <1268101394.10871.1861.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4B95C2AF.7010508@cn.fujitsu.com> <1268446049.4471.787.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1268446049.4471.787.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 09:07:29PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > >Americo, > >I still do not know why the function graph tracer is making your system >unusable. I'll look more into that when I get a chance. So far, I have >not had any issues on any of my boxes. > Oh, in fact, I just tried 2 x86_64 machines, both of them have this problem. Sorry that I don't have much time to do bisect, the last kernel that I tried is 2.6.32-rc6, it is bad too. I will try some older kernels if I have time. Thank you.