From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dwalker@codeaurora.org,
tiwai@suse.de, bruce.w.allan@intel.com, aili@codeaurora.org,
khilman@deeprootsystems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM_QOS updates for 2.6.34-rc1
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:08:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003142108.07164.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100314062637.GA12064@elf.ucw.cz>
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sat 2010-03-13 16:34:25, 640E9920 wrote:
> > The following patch series implements to following:
> > 1) pm_qos now uses a handle based implementation. No more string
> > compares while walking lists.
> > 2) renames the exports to using more accurate names.
> > 3) updates kernel clients of pm_qos per this change
> > 4) added ascii interface to pmqos recognizing strings formatted in 10
> > charactor format "0x12345678"
> > 5) added new pm_qos class, "system_bus_throughput"
> >
> > I would like to see this series make it into 2.6.34 if its not too late.
>
> I believe it is... -rc1 is past us.
It definitely is.
> Also... the way the patches are structured... that will break bisect, no?
Not only that. Some changelogs would be heartily welcome. In short, what
change the particular patch is going to make and why it's useful.
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-14 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-14 0:34 [PATCH] PM_QOS updates for 2.6.34-rc1 640E9920
2010-03-14 6:26 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-14 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-03-19 14:30 ` mark gross
2010-03-19 19:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-19 19:52 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003142108.07164.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=aili@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
--cc=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox