From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933928Ab0CNVVj (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:21:39 -0400
Received: from bar.sig21.net ([80.81.252.164]:50823 "EHLO bar.sig21.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932349Ab0CNVVh (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:21:37 -0400
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:23:10 +0100
From: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: lguest@ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
       Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Lguest]  2.6.33 guest crash (was: Re: 2.6.32-rc5 guest crash)
Message-ID: <20100314212310.GA3388@sig21.net>
References: <20091025175521.GA13300@sig21.net>
 <200910261426.05769.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
 <20100314173459.GA919@sig21.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100314173459.GA919@sig21.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Spam-21-Score: -3.6 (---)
X-Spam-21-Report: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8,AWL=0.784,BAYES_00=-2.599 autolearn=no
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 06:34:59PM +0100, I wrote:
> 
> Am I correct to assume that I can avoid the issue
> by switching to a 64bit kernel (on host + guest)?

Silly question  ;-/

So what would be the real fix?


Johannes