From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] wait_for_helper: SIGCHLD from user-space can lead to use-after-free
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:48:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100315194824.GE10896@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100315194609.GA10896@redhat.com>
1. wait_for_helper() calls allow_signal(SIGCHLD) to ensure the child
can't autoreap itself.
However, this means that a spurious SIGCHILD from user-space can
set TIF_SIGPENDING and:
- kernel_thread() or sys_wait4() can fail due to signal_pending()
- worse, wait4() can fail before ____call_usermodehelper() execs
or exits. In this case the caller may kfree(subprocess_info)
while the child still uses this memory.
Change the code to use SIG_DFL instead of magic "(void __user *)2"
set by allow_signal(). This means that SIGCHLD won't be delivered,
yet the child won't autoreap itsefl.
The problem is minor, only root can send a signal to this kthread.
2. If sys_wait4(&ret) fails it doesn't populate "ret", in this case
wait_for_helper() reports a random value from uninitialized var.
With this patch sys_wait4() should never fail, but still it makes
sense to initialize ret = -ECHILD so that the caller can notice
the problem.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
---
kernel/kmod.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- 34-rc1/kernel/kmod.c~4_SIGCHLD_RACE 2010-03-15 20:17:47.000000000 +0100
+++ 34-rc1/kernel/kmod.c 2010-03-15 20:28:31.000000000 +0100
@@ -175,16 +175,16 @@ static int wait_for_helper(void *data)
struct subprocess_info *sub_info = data;
pid_t pid;
- /* Install a handler: if SIGCLD isn't handled sys_wait4 won't
- * populate the status, but will return -ECHILD. */
- allow_signal(SIGCHLD);
+ /* If SIGCLD is ignored sys_wait4 won't populate the status. */
+ spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
+ current->sighand->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
+ spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
pid = kernel_thread(____call_usermodehelper, sub_info, SIGCHLD);
if (pid < 0) {
sub_info->retval = pid;
} else {
- int ret;
-
+ int ret = -ECHILD;
/*
* Normally it is bogus to call wait4() from in-kernel because
* wait4() wants to write the exit code to a userspace address.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-15 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-15 12:29 [PATCH 0/2] exec: refactor how call_usermodehelper works, and update the sense of the core_pipe recursion check (v4 rediff) Neil Horman
2010-03-15 12:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] kmod: add init function to usermodehelper Neil Horman
2010-03-15 17:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-15 17:56 ` Neil Horman
2010-03-15 12:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] exec: replace call_usermodehelper_pipe with use of umh init function and resolve limit Neil Horman
2010-03-15 17:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-15 19:46 ` [PATCH 0/6] umh: keys, signals, misc Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-15 19:46 ` [PATCH 1/6] umh: creds: convert call_usermodehelper_keys() to use subprocess_info->init() Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-15 19:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] umh: creds: kill subprocess_info->cred logic Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-15 19:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] call_usermodehelper: no need to unblock signals Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-15 19:48 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-03-15 19:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] call_usermodehelper: simplify/fix UMH_NO_WAIT case Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-15 19:49 ` [PATCH 6/6] call_usermodehelper: UMH_WAIT_EXEC ignores kernel_thread() failure Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-16 19:37 ` [PATCH 0/4] do_coredump: cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-16 19:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] coredump: factor out the not-ispipe file checks Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-16 19:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] coredump: cleanup "ispipe" code Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-16 19:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] coredump: factor out put_cred() calls Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-16 19:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] coredump: shift down_write(mmap_sem) into coredump_wait() Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100315194824.GE10896@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox